We suggest that when confronted with evidence of their socially inappropriate thoughts and feelings, people are sometimes less likely-and not more likely-to acknowledge them because evidence can elicit psychological responses that inhibit candid self-reflection. In 3 studies, participants were induced to exhibit racial bias (Study 1) or to experience inappropriate sexual arousal (Studies 2 and 3). Some participants were then told that the researcher had collected physiological evidence of these mental transgressions. Results showed that participants who were told about the evidence were less willing to acknowledge their mental transgressions, but only if they were told before they had an opportunity to engage in self-reflection. These results suggest that under some circumstances, confronting people with public evidence of their private shortcomings can be counterproductive. (PsycINFO Database Record

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000174DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mental transgressions
12
studies participants
8
participants told
8
evidence
5
caught red-minded
4
red-minded evidence-induced
4
evidence-induced denial
4
denial mental
4
transgressions confronted
4
confronted evidence
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!