To determine equivalence between perimeters, 49 eyes of 35 subjects underwent static threshold testing of the central 30 degrees twice on each of three automated perimeters and twice by manual kinetic threshold testing with the Goldmann perimeter. The Octopus-Humphrey difference was 3.3 dB (2.3 dB in the upper two rows for programs 32 and 30-2). The Dicon-Octopus difference was 3.5 dB and the Dicon-Humphrey, 6.5 dB. The I4e stimulus of the Goldmann perimeter was equivalent to 17.1 dB, 13.6 dB, and 10.8 dB on the Humphrey, Octopus, and Dicon perimeters, respectively. The III4e stimulus of the Goldmann perimeter, used for visual impairment determination, was roughly equivalent to 7 to 10 dB, 4 to 7 dB, and 0 to 6 dB on the Humphrey, Octopus, and Dicon perimeters, respectively. The prediction when converting from one instrument to another was only 10% less reliable than the ability of a perimeter to predict the values on a second examination with the same perimeter. Validity of the conversion formulas was confirmed by the age-corrected normal values available for the Octopus, Humphrey, and Goldmann perimeters.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(89)90493-5 | DOI Listing |
Ophthalmol Sci
July 2024
Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, San Diego, California.
Purpose: To construct a comprehensive reference database (RDB) for a novel binocular automated perimeter.
Design: A four-site prospective randomized clinical trial.
Subjects And Controls: Three hundred fifty-six healthy subjects without ocular conditions that might affect visual function were categorized into 7 age groups.
PLoS One
March 2024
Division of Ophthalmology and the Laboratory for Investigation in Ophthalmology (LIM-33), Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Purpose: To compare the relationship between macular ganglion cell layer (mGCL) thickness and 10-2 visual field (VF) sensitivity using different stimulus sizes in patients with temporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 30 eyes from 25 patients with temporal VF loss on 24-2 SITA standard automated perimetry due to previous chiasmal compression and 30 healthy eyes (23 controls). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macular area and 10-2 VF testing using Goldmann stimulus size I (GI), II (GII), and III (GIII) were performed in the Octopus 900 perimeter.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep
December 2023
Department of Ophthalmology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Purpose: To report a case of functional visual loss (FVL) diagnosed through bilateral randomized visual field testing using Imo vifa with a trick method.
Observations: A 27-year-old man complained of visual field abnormality in his left eye after falling from a height of 4 m. The left eye had a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/16 and a critical flicker frequency (CFF) of 44.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
November 2023
Department of Ophthalmology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Purpose: To evaluate the visual field after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy and laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity.
Method: Retrospective cohort study. Infants with retinopathy of prematurity treated by anti-VEGF therapy or laser treatment were included in the study.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!