Fighting experience affects fruit fly behavior in a mating context.

Naturwissenschaften

Laboratoire Evolution, Génomes, Comportement, Ecologie, Avenue de la Terrasse, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Published: June 2016

In animals, correlations exist among behaviors within individuals, but it is unclear whether experience in a specific functional context can affect behavior across different contexts. Here, we use Drosophila melanogaster to investigate the effects of conflict-induced behavioral modifications on male mating behavior. In D. melanogaster, males fight for territories and experience a strong winner-loser effect, meaning that winners become more likely to win subsequent fights compared to losers, who continue to lose. In our protocol, males were tested for courtship intensity before and after fighting against other males. We show that male motivation to copulate before fights cannot predict the fight outcomes, but that, afterwards, losers mate less than before and less than winner and control males. Contrarily, winners show no differences between pre- and post-fight courtship intensity, and do not differ from control males. This suggests that the physiological modifications resulting from fight outcomes indirectly affect male reproductive behavior.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-016-1368-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

courtship intensity
8
fight outcomes
8
control males
8
males
5
fighting experience
4
experience fruit
4
fruit fly
4
behavior
4
fly behavior
4
behavior mating
4

Similar Publications

Insects copulate multiple times not only with different mates but also with the same mate, which is called repeated copulation. It occurs as a repeated alternation between copulation and mate-guarding, leading to the prolonged physical attachment between males and females. Particularly, in species where males forcefully grasp females, attempt to mate without courtship and exhibit repeated copulations, male and female morphological traits are expected to be associated with mating characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparation of pheromone-binding proteins 1 and 2 of Spodoptera frugiperda in perceiving the three sex pheromone components Z9-14:Ac, Z7-12: Ac and Z11-16: Ac.

Pestic Biochem Physiol

December 2024

Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, PR China. Electronic address:

Pheromone-binding proteins (PBPs) are mainly responsible for binding and transporting hydrophobic pheromone molecules across the aqueous sensilla lymph to the receptor proteins. The preference of each PBP is believed to be different for each pheromone component within a single species. Significantly higher expression level of PBP1 and PBP2 in the male antennae of Spodoptera frugiperda suggesting that SfruPBP1 and SfruPBP2 might play important roles in pheromone perception.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Whole-brain in situ mapping of neuronal activation in during social behaviors and optogenetic stimulation.

Elife

November 2024

Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute for Neuroscience, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States.

Article Synopsis
  • - The study addresses the difficulty of monitoring neuronal activity in small, opaque organisms like fruit flies during social behaviors, which traditional methods fail to capture without interfering in their natural behaviors.
  • - Researchers use a new technique called HCR-3.0 to map brain-wide activity of aggression-related neurons during courtship and aggression, focusing on male-specific P1 interneurons.
  • - By leveraging HI-FISH and optogenetic methods, the team identifies and compares the activity of P1 neurons across different behaviors, providing insights into how these neurons respond differently during courtship versus aggression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Competition over resources is often decided via aggressive interactions, which may or may not escalate to all-out fights. Weapons and body size play important roles in such interactions, as they often provide reliable cues of an individual's fighting ability. In contrast, traits like nonfunctional display "weapons" may dishonestly exaggerate fighting ability in order to intimidate opponents into retreating.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Understanding sexual communication requires assessing the behaviour of both the sender and the receiver. Receiver responses to sexual displays carry relevant information, but such signals or cues may be subtle and therefore technically challenging to investigate. Here, we focus on receiver body movements in response to high-intensity courtship in spotted bowerbirds ().

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!