Objective: To identify the risk factors for cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Methods: 667 patients underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery between November 2011 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed by the medical recording system in our institute. 8 patients experiencing cage retropulsion were included and 2 underwent the initial surgery in other hospitals. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scores (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Plain radiographs and three-dimensional computed tomography scans were used to analyze the incidence of cage retropulsion. Data were analyzed by SPSS 19.0.

Results: The incidence of cage retropulsion was 0.90%(6 out of 665) in our institution. There were 6 male and 2 female with an average age of 45.63 ± 15.48(range, 21-60). The average follow-up time was 23.88 ± 12.69 months(range, 6-43 months) and average retropulsion onset time was 2.75 months(range,1-6 months). 6 patients experienced cage retropulsion at L5/S1 and 2 at L4/5. 6 used bullet-shaped cages and two had kidney-shaped cages. Average bed rest time after the initial surgery was 5.75 ± 1.67 days. 6 patients had neurological deficits and underwent revision surgery. Average operation time and blood loss for revision surgery were much higher than those of the initial surgery (P < 0.05). All the patients got a good result in VAS and ODI both from initial surgery and revision surgery (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: There were multiple risk factors for cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion surgery, including patient factors, radiological characteristics, surgical techniques and postoperative reasons. In case of retropulsion, revision surgery was essential for the patients who presented neurological deficits and conservative treatment was recommended for asymptomatic patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cage retropulsion
24
lumbar interbody
12
interbody fusion
12
initial surgery
12
risk factors
8
factors cage
8
retropulsion lumbar
8
fusion surgery
8
incidence cage
8
revision surgery
8

Similar Publications

A 70-year-old man presented with severe lower-back pain and left L5 radiculopathy that was resistant to all forms of conservative treatment. Imaging showed a grade 1 unstable degenerative listhesis at L4/5 that resulted in severe left lateral recess stenosis. To this end, he underwent an uneventful minimally invasive L4/5 unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and he was discharged 3 days later with complete relief of leg pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Mechanical failure following total spondylectomy is a surgical challenge. The cervicothoracic junction region is a special anatomical site with complex biomechanics, and few studies have reported a detailed surgical management strategy for cases where the mesh cage subsides and compresses the spinal cord in the cervicothoracic junction region after total spondylectomy.

Case Presentation: A 56-year-old male patient experienced screw and rod fracture and mesh cage retropulsion into the spinal canal 5 years after total spondylectomy for osteochondroma in the first to third thoracic vertebrae.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transdural retrieval of retropulsed transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cages.

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine

May 2024

Virginia Mason Department of Neurosciences and Spine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs) are performed for various lumbar spine pathologies. Posterior migration of an interbody cage is a complication that may result in neurologic injury and require reoperation. Sparse information exists regarding the safety and efficacy of a transdural approach for cage retrieval.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To identify the cage retropulsion (CR)-associated risk factors following lumbar interbody fusion (LIF).

Material And Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent LIF between January 2014 and December 2018 at three medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into CR group and non-CR (NCR) group according to whether they experienced CR or not.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with grade-1 L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Methods: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the comparative analysis included consecutive patients with grade-1 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent oblique LIF (OLIF, n = 36) or minimally invasive transforaminal LIF (MI-TLIF, n = 45) at the Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2016 to August 2017. Patient satisfaction Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), radiographic outcomes including anterior/posterior disc heights (ADH/PDH), foraminal height (FH), foraminal width (FW), cage subsidence, cage retropulsion, and fusion rate were assessed during a 2-year follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!