AI Article Synopsis

  • Handgrip strength (HGS) is an important health indicator linked to overall mortality and frailty, but existing reference values are mainly based on Caucasian populations from rich countries.
  • A study involving 125,462 adults from 21 countries measured HGS using a Jamar dynamometer and found significant regional differences, with Europe/North America having the highest values and South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Africa the lowest.
  • The results suggest that HGS should be assessed using specific reference ranges based on geographic region, age, and sex to ensure accurate interpretation of individual measurements.

Article Abstract

Background: The measurement of handgrip strength (HGS) has prognostic value with respect to all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease, and is an important part of the evaluation of frailty. Published reference ranges for HGS are mostly derived from Caucasian populations in high-income countries. There is a paucity of information on normative HGS values in non-Caucasian populations from low- or middle-income countries. The objective of this study was to develop reference HGS ranges for healthy adults from a broad range of ethnicities and socioeconomically diverse geographic regions.

Methods: HGS was measured using a Jamar dynamometer in 125,462 healthy adults aged 35-70 years from 21 countries in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study.

Results: HGS values differed among individuals from different geographic regions. HGS values were highest among those from Europe/North America, lowest among those from South Asia, South East Asia and Africa, and intermediate among those from China, South America, and the Middle East. Reference ranges stratified by geographic region, age, and sex are presented. These ranges varied from a median (25-75 percentile) 50 kg (43-56 kg) in men <40 years from Europe/North America to 18 kg (14-20 kg) in women >60 years from South East Asia. Reference ranges by ethnicity and body-mass index are also reported.

Conclusions: Individual HGS measurements should be interpreted using region/ethnic-specific reference ranges.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4833755PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12112DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reference ranges
20
healthy adults
12
hgs values
12
handgrip strength
8
125462 healthy
8
countries prospective
8
prospective urban
8
urban rural
8
hgs
8
mortality cardiovascular
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!