AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks using supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches for surgical anesthesia below the shoulder, regardless of the patient's body mass index (BMI).
  • A total of 101 patients were randomized into three groups for comparison, and the research found no significant differences in anesthesia quality, discomfort, or performance time between the approaches.
  • The results indicate that all three block techniques provide similar surgical anesthesia effectiveness, with minor variations in performance time and no major adverse effects noted, apart from a few cases of transient Horner syndrome.

Article Abstract

Objective: We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves will be blocked separately because they are not a part of the brachial plexus.

Methods: This is a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. The three approaches of the US-guided BPB without neurostimulation were compared for quality, performance time, and correlation between performance time and BMI. Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerve blocks were used in all patients.

Results: A total of 101 patients were randomized into three groups: SCL (supraclavicular), ICL (infraclavicular), and AX (axillary). Seven patients were excluded due to various factors. All three groups were similar in demographic data, M:F proportion, preoperative diagnosis and type of surgery, anesthesiologists who performed the block, and surgical staff that performed the surgical intervention. The time between the end of the block performance and the start of the operation was also similar. The quality of the surgical anesthesia and discomfort during the operation were identical following comparison between groups. No direct positive correlation was observed between BMI and the block performance time. The time for the axillary block was slightly longer than the time for the supra- and infraclavicular approaches, but it had no practical clinical significance. Transient Horner syndrome was observed in three patients in the SCL group. No other adverse effects or complications were observed.

Conclusions: All three approaches can be used for US-guided BPB with similar quality of surgical anesthesia for operations of below the shoulder. A block of the intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves is recommended. Obesity is not a significant factor in relation to the time of US-guided BPB performance, or the quality of surgical anesthesia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01442558.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839540PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10240DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical anesthesia
20
quality surgical
16
infraclavicular axillary
12
intercostobrachial medial
12
medial brachial
12
brachial cutaneous
12
us-guided bpb
12
performance time
12
axillary approaches
8
brachial plexus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!