Shared Decision-Making and Patient Empowerment in Preventive Cardiology.

Curr Cardiol Rep

Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Carnegie 591, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

Published: May 2016

Shared decision-making, central to evidence-based medicine and good patient care, begins and ends with the patient. It is the process by which a clinician and a patient jointly make a health decision after discussing options, potential benefits and harms, and considering the patient's values and preferences. Patient empowerment is crucial to shared decision-making and occurs when a patient accepts responsibility for his or her health. They can then learn to solve their own problems with information and support from professionals. Patient empowerment begins with the provider acknowledging that patients are ultimately in control of their care and aims to increase a patient's capacity to think critically and make autonomous, informed decisions about their health. This article explores the various components of shared decision-making in scenarios such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia, heart failure, and diabetes. It explores barriers and the potential for improving medication adherence, disease awareness, and self-management of chronic disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0729-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shared decision-making
16
patient empowerment
12
patient
7
shared
4
decision-making patient
4
empowerment preventive
4
preventive cardiology
4
cardiology shared
4
decision-making central
4
central evidence-based
4

Similar Publications

Background: The surgical management of complicated diverticulitis varies across Europe. EAES members prioritized this topic to be addressed by a clinical practice guideline through an online questionnaire.

Objective: To develop evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for key stakeholders involved in the treatment of complicated diverticulitis; to improve operative and perioperative outcomes, patient experience and quality of life through a systematic evidence-to-decision approach by a diverse, multidisciplinary panel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To explore the experiences of long-term sick-listed employees and those of employers with communication and collaboration during sick leave and the return-to-work (RTW) process.

Methods: Previously long-term sick-listed employees ( = 9) and employers ( = 9) were interviewed about their experiences with communication and collaboration during sick leave and RTW. Thematic analysis, utilizing patient journey mapping was applied to analyze and map out their experiences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

On September 23-24 (2024) the 6th Workshop IRE on Translational Oncology, titled "Cancer Organoids as Reliable Disease Models to Drive Clinical Development of Novel Therapies," took place at the IRCCS Regina Elena Cancer Institute in Rome. This prominent international conference focused on tumor organoids, bringing together leading experts from around the world.A central challenge in precision oncology is modeling the dynamic tumor ecosystem, which encompasses numerous elements that evolve spatially and temporally.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Breast implant surgery is a popular, globally performed, and frequently requested cosmetic and reconstructive surgical procedure. Breast implant surgery can cause implant-associated systemic symptoms and types of implant-associated cancers, so it is vital to monitor patient outcomes. Most patients who undergo breast implant surgery do not experience health problems.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Positive and negative framing of complication risk and long-term outcomes influences decision-making in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Surgeon

December 2024

Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA; Robert Walmsley University Professor, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Background: The framing effect has been demonstrated in a variety of settings. This study aimed to determine whether framing of complication risk in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and long-term patient satisfaction rates in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) influences patient decision-making and 'worry' using hypothetical vignettes.

Methods: Two cross-sectional survey studies were undertaken, one based on a THA vignette and one based on a TKA vignette.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!