Multiplicity is common in clinical studies and the current standard is to use the familywise error rate to ensure that the errors are kept at a prespecified level. In this paper, we will show that, in certain situations, familywise error rate control does not account for all errors made. To counteract this problem, we propose the use of the expected number of false claims (EFC). We will show that a (weighted) Bonferroni approach can be used to control the EFC, discuss how a study that uses the EFC can be powered for co-primary, exchangeable, and hierarchical endpoints, and show how the weight for the weighted Bonferroni test can be determined in this manner. ©2016 The Authors. Pharmaceutical Statistics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5021178PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pst.1751DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

expected number
8
number false
8
false claims
8
familywise error
8
error rate
8
weighted bonferroni
8
mistakes worse
4
worse one?
4
one? proposal
4
proposal controlling
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!