Association Between Contact Lens Discomfort and Pre-lens Tear Film Kinetics.

Optom Vis Sci

*PhD, FAAO †BSc(Hons), MSc ‡BA, BSc(Hons) §BSc(Hons) ∥MSTOptom OCULAR TECHNOLOGY GROUP-International, London, United Kingdom (MG, KD, BT, BW, KP, GB, TP); and School of Life and Health Science, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom (MG).

Published: August 2016

Purpose: The relationship between contact lens wettability and comfort has been extensively evaluated; however, a direct correlation between the characteristics of the pre-lens tear film and the symptoms associated with contact lens discomfort has yet to be established. In addition, there is relatively limited knowledge relating to the entire tear film kinetics during the inter-blink period in contact lens wearers. The purpose of this analysis was to identify the characteristics of the pre-lens tear film kinetics that may be associated with the symptoms of contact lens discomfort.

Methods: The study population comprised 202 soft (hydrogel and silicone hydrogel) contact lens wearers attending pre-screening visits at the OTG-i research clinic. All participants completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and the tear film was quantified via post hoc, masked analysis of high definition digital Tearscope videos recorded at the visit. The tear film kinetics of the least symptomatic wearers (OSDI lowest quintile scores, n = 45) were compared to the tear film kinetics of the most symptomatic wearers (OSDI highest quintile scores, n = 43). The hypothesis tested was that the tear film kinetics of asymptomatic wearers were better than tear film kinetics of symptomatic wearers.

Results: The distribution of lens types worn was as follows: Daily Disposable 46.5%, 1-Month Replacement 39.6%, and 2-Week Replacement 13.6%. 48.2% of lenses were silicone hydrogel and 51.8% hydrogel. Symptomatic wearers had a shorter break-up time (4.7 s vs. 6.0 s; p = 0.003), lesser surface coverage by the tear film during the interblink period (95.1% vs. 98.5%; p < 0.001) and greater surface exposure at the time of the blink (9.4% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.001).

Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that the tear film kinetics of asymptomatic and symptomatic contact lens wearers were different, the findings supporting the hypothesis of poorer tear film kinetics for symptomatic than asymptomatic wearers in a general contact lens wearing population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000866DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tear film
48
film kinetics
36
contact lens
32
kinetics symptomatic
16
tear
12
pre-lens tear
12
film
12
lens wearers
12
symptomatic wearers
12
lens
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!