AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of using native vaginal tissue repair as a surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on quality of life using validated questionnaires.

Study Design: Fifty-one women underwent surgical POP repair. All of the women were evaluated by physical examination using the POP-Q, ICIQ-VS and P-QoL questionnaires prior to surgery as well as six and at least 30 months after surgery.

Results: Fifty-one patients returned for assessment at least 30 months after surgery (median 36 months, range 30-50 months). There was significant improvement in most points - Aa, Ba, C, Bp, Ap, and hg - and at the stage of prolapse. There were statistically significant improvements in bulge symptoms after surgery (p<0.001), and significant differences were also seen regarding questions related to urinary and bowel symptoms. Indeed, most quality of life questionnaire domains showed significant differences before and after surgery.

Conclusion: Native vaginal tissue repair improved POP-related symptoms and quality of life after 30-50 months of assessment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

native vaginal
8
vaginal tissue
8
tissue repair
8
surgical treatment
8
months
5
repair genital
4
genital prolapse
4
prolapse surgical
4
treatment minimum
4
minimum months
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!