[Effect of Modified Guipi Decoction on Blood Pressure and Quality of Life in Hypertension Patients Complicated Depression].

Objective: To study the effect of Modified Guipi Decoction (MGD) on blood pressure and quality of life (QOL) in hypertension patients complicated depression.

Methods: Totally 245 hypertension patients complicated depression were randomly assigned to the treatment group (125 cases, treated with MGD) and the control group (120 cases, treated with Sertraline). Final recruited qualified patients were 117 cases in the treatment group and 111 cases in the control group. The therapeutic course for all was 4 weeks. Changes of blood pressure, scores rated by Hamilton Depression Scale-17 (HAMD-17), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), short-form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36), and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) were observed before and after treatment, thereby judging their efficacies.

Results: (1) Compared with before treatment in the same group, systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly decreased in the treatment group after 2 weeks of treatment; systolic blood pressure significantly-decreased after 2 weeks of treatment and diastolic blood pressure significantly decreased after 3 weeks of treatment in the control group (all P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Decreased valley values of systolic and diastolic blood pressures at week 2, 3, and 4 after treatment were obviously higher than those at week 1 after treatment in the two groups (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Compared with the control group at week 4 after treatment, valley value of systolic blood pressure obviously decreased in the treatment group (P <0. 01). Decreased valley values of systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the treatment group were higher than those of the control group (P <0. 01). The success rate of target blood pressure was 60. 7% (71/117 cases) in the treatment group and 42. 3% (47/111 cases) in the control group, with statistical difference (χ² = 7.6781, P < 0.01). (2) Compared with before treatment in the same group, the score of HAMD-17 at week 2, 3, and 4 after treatment all decreased in the two groups (P < 0.01). Compared with the control group, the score of HAMD-17 at week 4 after treatment decreased more obviously in the treatment group, with higher difference in decreased value (P < 0.05). The effective rate was 79.5% (93/117) in the treatment group, higher than that in the control group [66.7% (74/111); χ² = 4.7741, P < 0.05]. (3) Compared with before treatment in the same group, the score of HAMA at week 1, 2, 3, and 4 after treatment all obviously decreased in the two groups (P <0. 05, P <0. 01). Compared with the control group, the score of HAMA at week 3 and 4 after treatment decreased more obviously in the treatment group, with higher difference in decreased value (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). (4) After 4 weeks of treatment, except physical function in the control group, SF-36 total score and the score for each factor were obviously higher in the two groups (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). MGD showed superior effect in improving physical function, physical activity, overall health, emotion activity, and health changes to that of Sertraline (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). (5) The incidence of insomnia, tremor, liability to agitation, dizziness was obviously less in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: MGD had favorable clinical effect on hypertension patients complicated depression. Meanwhile, it also could improve their blood pressure and QOL.