Background: The comparative effectiveness of performing instrumented (rigid pedicle screws affixed to titanium alloy rods) lumbar spinal fusion in addition to decompressive laminectomy in patients with symptomatic lumbar grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is unknown.
Methods: In this randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients, 50 to 80 years of age, who had stable degenerative spondylolisthesis (degree of spondylolisthesis, 3 to 14 mm) and symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis to undergo either decompressive laminectomy alone (decompression-alone group) or laminectomy with posterolateral instrumented fusion (fusion group). The primary outcome measure was the change in the physical-component summary score of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36; range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life) 2 years after surgery. The secondary outcome measure was the score on the Oswestry Disability Index (range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disability related to back pain). Patients were followed for 4 years.
Results: A total of 66 patients (mean age, 67 years; 80% women) underwent randomization. The rate of follow-up was 89% at 1 year, 86% at 2 years, and 68% at 4 years. The fusion group had a greater increase in SF-36 physical-component summary scores at 2 years after surgery than did the decompression-alone group (15.2 vs. 9.5, for a difference of 5.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.1 to 11.3; P=0.046). The increases in the SF-36 physical-component summary scores in the fusion group remained greater than those in the decompression-alone group at 3 years and at 4 years (P=0.02 for both years). With respect to reductions in disability related to back pain, the changes in the Oswestry Disability Index scores at 2 years after surgery did not differ significantly between the study groups (-17.9 in the decompression-alone group and -26.3 in the fusion group, P=0.06). More blood loss and longer hospital stays occurred in the fusion group than in the decompression-alone group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The cumulative rate of reoperation was 14% in the fusion group and 34% in the decompression-alone group (P=0.05).
Conclusions: Among patients with degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis, the addition of lumbar spinal fusion to laminectomy was associated with slightly greater but clinically meaningful improvement in overall physical health-related quality of life than laminectomy alone. (Funded by the Jean and David Wallace Foundation and others; SLIP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00109213.).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1508788 | DOI Listing |
Neurosurg Rev
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Neurology and Neurosurgery Unit, Federal University of Góias, Góias, 74690-900, Brazil.
Multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent degenerative condition characterized by lower back pain, intermittent claudication, and radicular leg pain. It ranks as one of the primary indications of spinal surgery in patients aged 65 and older. In this study, we aim to compare single-level and multilevel approaches for decompression alone in LSS considering the incidence of complications, reduction in pain score, and rates of surgical revisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSpine J
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haeundae Bumin Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Background Context: Stiffness-related functional disability (SRFD) is a well-known complication after long-segment fusion surgery. However, SRFD following decompression with short-segment fusion (1 or 2 levels) compared with decompression alone surgery in the lower lumbar region, which accounts for a significant portion of lumbar range of motion, is poorly documented.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare SRFD after decompression alone (D-A) surgery and decompression with short-segment fusion (D+F) surgery in the lower lumbar region.
Eur Spine J
December 2024
Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between surgical levels and coronal deformity to identify risk factors for failing to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) following short-segment isolated decompression or fusion surgery in patients with degenerative scoliosis (DS) and concurrent lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), without severe sagittal deformity malalignment.
Methods: Patients with degenerative scoliosis who underwent 1- or 2-level lumbar isolated decompression or fusion surgery were included. Surgical level was labeled as "Cobb-related" when decompression or surgical levels spanned or were between end vertebrae, and "outside" when the operative levels did not include the end vertebrae.
Exp Neurol
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Spine Center, China International Neuroscience Institute (CHINA-INI), Beijing, China; Research Center of Spine and Spinal Cord, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Lab of Spinal Cord Injury and Functional Reconstruction, China International Neuroscience Institute (CHINA-INI), Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address:
Syringomyelia is a neurological disease that is difficult to cure, and treatments often have limited effectiveness. In this study, a rat model of syringomyelia induced by epidural compression was used to investigate the factors that limit the prognosis of syringomyelia. After we treated syringomyelia rats with surgical decompression alone, MRI revealed that the syringomyelia rats did not show the expected therapeutic effect.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld Neurosurg
December 2024
Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; Department of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China; Graduate School of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China; Tianjin Institute of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin, China. Electronic address:
Objective: As a common clinical disease, lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is currently the preferred surgical treatment, and there are various opinions. We conducted a study on whether fusion should be performed simultaneously with decompression for LSS caused by low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and compared the efficacy and safety of the 2 surgeries.
Methods: We conducted literature searches on Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases to search for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared decompression alone and decompression plus fusion in the treatment of LSS with low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!