A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Methods of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts]. | LitMetric

[Methods of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts].

Khirurgiia (Mosk)

A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

Published: June 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the author's experience with internal drainage techniques for pancreatic pseudocysts, noting the use of both plastic and metal stents across different cases.
  • Results indicated a high success rate of 91% in 25 patients, with one instance of a serious complication requiring surgery.
  • The conclusion emphasizes the need for further research to determine the best techniques, as various methods address different challenges in treatment.

Article Abstract

Aim: To present own experience of internal drainage and characteristics of its different variants which are applied in various countries.

Material And Methods: Endosonography-assisted internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts was performed in 25 patients. Plastic stents were implanted in one stage without change of instruments while metal stents - with change of instruments during manipulation.

Results: Intervention was successful in 24 patients. In 1 case bleeding developed during cystostomy that required open surgery. Plastic and metal stents were used in 11 and 12 patients respectively. 1 patient had two pancreatic pseudocysts. Therefore 2 stents of both types were used in this case. Clinical success was achieved in 91% of cases.

Conclusion: Different variants of method resolve problem of surgical approach, stomy and choice of stent. However every technique is targeted to resolve separate problem while single method is not accepted. Further large comparative studies are necessary to define optimal technique of internal drainage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2016318-25DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

internal drainage
16
drainage pancreatic
8
pancreatic pseudocysts
8
change instruments
8
metal stents
8
[methods internal
4
drainage
4
pancreatic pseudocysts]
4
pseudocysts] aim
4
aim experience
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!