Cost of care for cancer patients in England: evidence from population-based patient-level data.

Br J Cancer

Business School, Imperial College London, Tanaka Building, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Published: May 2016

Background: Health systems are facing the challenge of providing care to an increasing population of patients with cancer. However, evidence on costs is limited due to the lack of large longitudinal databases.

Methods: We matched cost of care data to population-based, patient-level data on cancer patients in England. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients age 18 and over with a diagnosis of colorectal (275 985 patients), breast (359 771), prostate (286 426) and lung cancer (283 940) in England between 2001 and 2010. Incidence costs, prevalence costs, and phase of care costs were estimated separately for patients age 18-64 and ⩾65. Costs of care were compared by patients staging, before and after diagnosis, and with a comparison population without cancer.

Results: Incidence costs in the first year of diagnosis are noticeably higher in patients age 18-64 than age ⩾65 across all examined cancers. A lower stage diagnosis is associated with larger cost savings for colorectal and breast cancer in both age groups. The additional costs of care because of the main four cancers amounts to £1.5 billion in 2010, namely 3.0% of the total cost of hospital care.

Conclusions: Population-based, patient-level data can be used to provide new evidence on the cost of cancer in England. Early diagnosis and cancer prevention have scope for achieving large cost savings for the health system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4891510PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.77DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

population-based patient-level
12
patient-level data
12
patients age
12
cost care
8
patients
8
cancer patients
8
patients england
8
incidence costs
8
age 18-64
8
costs care
8

Similar Publications

Background: Differing ABO blood groups between a mother and her fetus may confer a lower risk of serious neonatal infection. How sensitization in the first pregnancy influences this phenomenon in a subsequent pregnancy is unclear. Accordingly, this study determined whether maternal-newborn ABO blood group incongruence in a first pregnancy further modifies the risk of serious infection in a subsequent pregnancy marked by ABO incongruency.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Electronic health records (EHRs) have revolutionized the scale, speed, and granularity at which health data can be collated and summarized for epidemiologic purposes. However, population-level analyses of patient-level data are only as reliable as the accuracy or completeness of patient reporting, clinician data entry, and how systems are programmed. This commentary on a case argues that responsibility for the validity of EHR data should be shared among key stakeholders, including patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Opioid naïve older adults may be at risk of overdose after receiving an initial opioid prescription.

Methods: This population-based cohort study from a linked dataset of patients in Oregon, linking all payer claims data to other administrative datasets, aimed to assess the prescription- and patient-level characteristics associated with increased odds of opioid overdose after an initial opioid prescription. Included patients were ≥65 years old and received an index pain-formulation opioid prescription between 2016 and 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: African Americans have a higher prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) compared to White groups. T2D is a health disparity clinically characterized by dysregulation of lipids and chronic inflammation. However, how the relationships among biological and sociological predictors of T2D drive this disparity remains to be addressed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * They used a retrospective design to match patients receiving the multi-gene test to those undergoing single-gene testing, focusing on survival outcomes and costs from a healthcare payer's perspective.
  • * Results showed that multi-gene panel testing had longer turnaround times and slightly increased costs, but it also resulted in marginally better survival rates; however, the overall net monetary benefit was inconclusive, with varying cost-effectiveness results across multiple scenarios.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!