Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Br J Psychiatry

André R. Brunoni, MD, PhD, Adriano H. Moffa, BS, Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Neuromodulation, University Hospital & Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Felipe Fregni, MD, PhD, Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Ulrich Palm, MD, Frank Padberg, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany; Daniel M. Blumberger, MD, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, MD, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention and Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Djamila Bennabi, MD, Emmanuel Haffen, MD, Department of Clinical Psychiatry, Clinical Investigation Center 1431 Inserm, EA 481 Neurosciences, University Hospital of Besancon and FondaMental Foundation, Créteil, France; Angelo Alonzo, PhD, Colleen K. Loo, MD, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Black Dog Institute and St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Published: June 2016

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-pharmacological intervention for depression. It has mixed results, possibly caused by study heterogeneity.

Aims: To assess tDCS efficacy and to explore individual response predictors.

Method: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

Results: Data were gathered from six randomised sham-controlled trials, enrolling 289 patients. Active tDCS was significantly superior to sham for response (34% v. 19% respectively, odds ratio (OR) = 2.44, 95% CI 1.38-4.32, number needed to treat (NNT) = 7), remission (23.1% v. 12.7% respectively, OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.22-4.64, NNT = 9) and depression improvement (B coefficient 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-0.57). Mixed-effects models showed that, after adjustment for other predictors and confounders, treatment-resistant depression and higher tDCS 'doses' were, respectively, negatively and positively associated with tDCS efficacy.

Conclusions: The effect size of tDCS treatment was comparable with those reported for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and antidepressant drug treatment in primary care. The most important parameters for optimisation in future trials are depression refractoriness and tDCS dose.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4887722PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.164715DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transcranial direct
8
direct current
8
current stimulation
8
individual patient
8
patient data
8
tdcs
7
stimulation acute
4
acute major
4
major depressive
4
depressive episodes
4

Similar Publications

This review examines the therapeutic potential of neuromodulation methods, including neurofeedback, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as non-pharmacological interventions for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A comprehensive review of current studies was conducted, focusing on each technique's mechanism, application, and efficacy in managing ADHD symptoms and cognitive deficits. Studies included human participants with ADHD, evaluating changes in symptom severity and cognitive outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Temporal interference stimulation (TIS) is a new form of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) that has been proposed as a method for targeted, noninvasive stimulation of deep brain structures. While TIS holds promise for a variety of clinical and nonclinical applications, little data is yet available regarding its effects in humans and its mechanisms of action. To inform the design and safe conduct of experiments involving TIS, researchers require quantitative guidance regarding safe exposure limits and other safety considerations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cross-Species Characterization of Transcranial Ultrasound Propagation.

Brain Stimul

January 2025

Pazhou Lab (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 510335, China; The School of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China. Electronic address:

Background: Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) has shown promising prospects as a non-invasive neuromodulation technique for both animals and humans. However, ultrasonic propagation characteristics within the brain differ significantly from those in free space. There is currently a lack of comprehensive studies on the effects of skull thickness on focal point position, full width at half maximum (FWHM), and acoustic intensity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Local effective connectivity changes after transcranial direct current stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients.

J Affect Disord

January 2025

School of Medicine and Health, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; School of Medicine and Health, TUM-NIC Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Aim: This study investigates the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on brain network connectivity in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled experimental design anodal tDCS (vs. sham) was applied in a total of 43 right-handed patients with OCD, targeting the right pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!