Purpose: To determine if Langerhans cells in the lid wiper are upregulated in contact lens-induced dry eye (CLIDE).
Methods: The lid wiper of one eye of 17 participants with CLIDE (assessed using the CLDEQ-8) and 29 without CLIDE (NO-CLIDE) was examined using a Heidelberg laser scanning confocal microscope after 6 months wear of daily disposable hydrogel contact lenses (Biomedics 1 day Extra). Twenty non-contact-lens-wearing controls were also examined. Langerhans cell density (LCD) in each participant was taken as the mean cell count calculated manually from six clear, randomly selected images of known dimensions.
Results: There were significant overall differences in LCD in the lid wiper among the three groups (p < 0.001). LCD was significantly greater in the lid wiper in CLIDE (17 ± 10 cells/mm) compared to controls (8 ± 4 cells/mm) (p < 0.001); however, there was no difference in LCD between NO-CLIDE (10 ± 5 cells/mm) and controls (p = 0.489). LCD was significantly greater in CLIDE than NO-CLIDE (p = 0.002).
Conclusions: Langerhans cells in the lid wiper are upregulated in CLIDE, suggesting an inflammatory component in the etiology of this condition.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000865 | DOI Listing |
Cont Lens Anterior Eye
December 2024
Center for Ocular Research & Education (CORE), School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada; School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy (LWE) is a recognized ocular condition affecting visual quality and ocular comfort, characterized by the damage of the marginal conjunctiva of the upper eyelid. This review critically examines the current strategies for LWE identification and explores the multifactorial etiology of LWE and its association with various ocular surface diseases. A literature review conducted on PubMed identified 67 relevant studies, which were analyzed to enhance understanding of LWE's diagnostic criteria and its clinical implications, offering future perspectives on improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
September 2024
Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Introduction: This cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus(DM) and its duration on indicators such as lid wiper epitheliopathy(LWE), and to assess the significance of LWE for early diagnosis of dry eye disease(DED) in DM patients.
Methods: A total of 137 subjects with ocular surface disease index(OSDI) score ≥13 were divided into the non-DM group, the short-term DM group (duration <5 years), and the mid-to-long-term DM group(duration ≥5 years). Evaluations were conducted for LWE, OSDI, lipid layer thickness (LLT), partial blinking rate (PBR), fluorescein tear breakup time (FTBUT), corneal fluorescein staining score (CFS), eyelid margin score, and meibomian gland dropout (MGd).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
September 2024
Centre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Background: Contact lens discomfort is a symptom-based clinical diagnosis that affects 13% to 75% of contact lens wearers. The Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society defines contact lens discomfort as "a condition characterized by episodic or persistent adverse ocular sensations related to lens wear either with or without visual disturbance, resulting from reduced compatibility between the lens and ocular environment, which can lead to decreased wearing time and discontinuation from lens wear." Signs of the condition include conjunctival hyperemia, corneal and conjunctival staining, altered blinking patterns, lid wiper epitheliopathy, and meibomian gland dysfunction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOptom Vis Sci
September 2024
School of Optometry, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Significance: When using lissamine green for bulbar conjunctival evaluation, the most staining was observed with two applications of the same strip in the same eye, wetted with a drop of saline. The first application was 5 seconds after wetting the strip, and the second was 1 minute later, followed by immediate viewing. This suggests that bulbar staining should be viewed before the lid wiper region.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOphthalmic Physiol Opt
November 2024
Department of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Purpose: To evaluate signs and symptoms in patients diagnosed with dry eye disease (DED), divided into dry eye (DE) groups, in order to find a new biomarker that allows an accurate diagnosis, management and classification of DED.
Methods: This cross-sectional, observational study included 71 DED subjects. Subjective symptoms, visual quality and DE signs were assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire, best corrected distance visual acuity (VA), functional visual acuity (FVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), high- and low-order corneal aberrations (HOA and LOA, respectively), tear break-up time (TBUT), Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD), Schirmer test, corneal staining, lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) and meibography.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!