Working Memory Training and Speech in Noise Comprehension in Older Adults.

Front Aging Neurosci

Department of Psychology, Queen's UniversityKingston, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western OntarioLondon, ON, Canada.

Published: April 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • Understanding speech in noisy environments is particularly difficult for older adults, and their ability to comprehend speech may rely on working memory and executive functions.
  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of adaptive working-memory training (Cogmed) on 24 older adults over 10 weeks but found that while participants improved on the training tasks, these improvements did not carry over to other cognitive tasks or enhance their ability to understand speech in noise.
  • Results indicated that working memory is linked to understanding low-context sentences, while contextually rich sentences may lessen cognitive load, showing the complexity of cognitive function and speech comprehension.

Article Abstract

Understanding speech in the presence of background sound can be challenging for older adults. Speech comprehension in noise appears to depend on working memory and executive-control processes (e.g., Heald and Nusbaum, 2014), and their augmentation through training may have rehabilitative potential for age-related hearing loss. We examined the efficacy of adaptive working-memory training (Cogmed; Klingberg et al., 2002) in 24 older adults, assessing generalization to other working-memory tasks (near-transfer) and to other cognitive domains (far-transfer) using a cognitive test battery, including the Reading Span test, sensitive to working memory (e.g., Daneman and Carpenter, 1980). We also assessed far transfer to speech-in-noise performance, including a closed-set sentence task (Kidd et al., 2008). To examine the effect of cognitive training on benefit obtained from semantic context, we also assessed transfer to open-set sentences; half were semantically coherent (high-context) and half were semantically anomalous (low-context). Subjects completed 25 sessions (0.5-1 h each; 5 sessions/week) of both adaptive working memory training and placebo training over 10 weeks in a crossover design. Subjects' scores on the adaptive working-memory training tasks improved as a result of training. However, training did not transfer to other working memory tasks, nor to tasks recruiting other cognitive domains. We did not observe any training-related improvement in speech-in-noise performance. Measures of working memory correlated with the intelligibility of low-context, but not high-context, sentences, suggesting that sentence context may reduce the load on working memory. The Reading Span test significantly correlated only with a test of visual episodic memory, suggesting that the Reading Span test is not a pure-test of working memory, as is commonly assumed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801856PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00049DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

working memory
32
older adults
12
reading span
12
span test
12
training
9
working
8
memory training
8
memory
8
adaptive working-memory
8
working-memory training
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!