A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Application Value of Selective Photon Shield in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography for Diagnosis of Intracranial Aneurysms. | LitMetric

Application Value of Selective Photon Shield in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography for Diagnosis of Intracranial Aneurysms.

J Craniofac Surg

*Medical Imaging Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming†Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

Published: May 2016

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the image quality of dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA) using the selective photon shield (SPS) technique to diagnose intracranial aneurysms.

Materials And Methods: Eighty patients with a suspected intracranial aneurysm were randomly assigned to undergo DECTA with SPS (ie, SPS-DECTA) or DECTA without SPS (ie, DECTA). The objective image quality of these 2 groups was compared with digital subtraction angiography and surgical results as the reference. The location, number, and morphology of the aneurysms were evaluated between the 2 groups. The display degree and the size of aneurysmal neck and the diameters (ie, long and short axis) of the aneurysm were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: The signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of SPS-DECTA were significantly higher than those of DECTA (P < 0.05). The difference between the 2 groups in intracranial vascular subjective scoring was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In 30 of the 40 patients in the SPS-DECTA group, an aneurysm was detected without misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis. The aneurysm location, aneurysm number, and measurements by the 2 methods were closely correlated without significant statistical differences (the R values were 0.953, 0.982, and 0.974, respectively; P = 0.000). The detection rate was 93% (26/28 patients). In the DECTA group, 2 patients were misdiagnosed. Mean long and short diameter and neck size by three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography were 5.82 ± 3.27, 4.67 ± 3.31, and 3.29 ± 1.38 mm, respectively. Aneurysm locations, number, and neck size by the 2 methods were closely correlated without a significant statistical difference (R values were 0.964, 0.968, and 0.856, respectively; P = 0.000).

Conclusions: The SPS-DECTA is very accurate for diagnosing intracranial aneurysms and could be a routine noninvasive screening method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002496DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

selective photon
8
photon shield
8
dual-energy computed
8
computed tomography
8
tomography angiography
8
intracranial aneurysms
8
image quality
8
decta sps
8
digital subtraction
8
subtraction angiography
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!