A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

How to evaluate BP measurements using the oscillometric method in atrial fibrillation: the value of pulse rate variation. | LitMetric

An oscillometric device is recommended for blood pressure (BP) measurement in atrial fibrillation (AF), but there is still controversy concerning its accuracy. Therefore, evaluation of BP values in AF patients remains a challenge. This study included 251 patients with AF and 154 participants with sinus rhythm (SR). Pulse rate (PR) and BP were measured using an oscillometric device three times. The differences between the highest and lowest PR and the systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) were calculated as ΔPR, ΔSBP and ΔDBP, respectively. AF patients were stratified with respect to ΔPR in 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and >15 subgroups. The AF group had a greater ΔPR (12.1±8.6 vs. 4.10±3.21 b.p.m., P<0.001), ΔSBP and ΔDBP than the SR group at similar SBP and DBP. A positive correlation existed between ΔPR and ΔSBP (r=0.255, P<0.001) in AF patients, but no correlation was found in SR subjects. Meanwhile, the ΔSBP in the 0-5 and 6-10 subgroups (9.58±5.61 and 10.67±6.77 vs. 8.45±5.25 mm Hg, nonsignificant) was similar to the SR group, whereas ΔSBP in the 11-15 and >15 subgroups was significantly greater than the SR group. Regardless of ΔPR, the ΔDBP in the AF group was significantly greater than that of the SR group. The AF patients who exhibited greater variability in their PR also had a greater variability in their SBP readings. The SBP measurement for AF patients is accurate as the measurement for patients with SR if the ΔPR is of 0-10 b.p.m. in AF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.31DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

atrial fibrillation
8
pulse rate
8
oscillometric device
8
evaluate measurements
4
measurements oscillometric
4
oscillometric method
4
method atrial
4
fibrillation pulse
4
rate variation
4
variation oscillometric
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!