Single-Level Rigid Fixation Combined with Coflex: A Biomechanical Study.

Med Sci Monit

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).

Published: March 2016

Background: The purpose of this biomechanical in vitro study was to compare the kinematics and intradiscal pressure achieved with 2 methods: L4-L5 pedicle screw-rod fixation (PSRF) with an upper L3-L4 Coflex device and L4-L5 PSRF alone. The results were used to characterize the biomechanics of the topping-off operation with a Coflex device for the lumbar motion segment adjacent to single-level rigid fixation.

Material/methods: Six human cadaveric spine specimens were biomechanically tested in vitro (6 males, 0 females). The 3-dimensional specimen motion in response to applied loads during flexibility tests was determined. Loads were applied along anatomic axes to induce flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. All specimens were first studied with intact lumbar motion segments, then with L4-L5 PSRF alone, and finally with L4-L5 PSRF with an upper L3-L4 Coflex device. A non-paired comparison of the 3 configurations under 3 different conditions was made.

Results: PSRF, with or without a Coflex device, significantly increased the range of motion (ROM) in the upper adjacent motion segments in all directions of loading. The intradiscal pressure (IDP) changed slightly. A correlation analysis showed that the ROM and IDP are significantly positively correlated. The application of the upper motion segment of the Coflex device provided greater stability in all directions of motion than did PSRF alone, particularly for extension (p<0.05), while use of a Coflex device did not significantly decrease the IDP compared with PSRF alone (p>0.05).

Conclusions: These results suggest that L4-L5 PSRF with an L3-L4 Coflex device is more stable than L4-L5 PSRF alone. PSRF with an upper Coflex device is a promising alternative to PSRF alone. Based on these biomechanical tests, it might be considered a protective method to prevent adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), although some limitations with this in vitro study must be addressed in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4815995PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/msm.896706DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coflex device
28
l4-l5 psrf
20
psrf upper
12
l3-l4 coflex
12
psrf
10
single-level rigid
8
coflex
8
vitro study
8
intradiscal pressure
8
upper l3-l4
8

Similar Publications

Background: Interspinous process devices (IPDs) introduce a new class of complications to surgical decompression without fusion: hardware-related complications. The purpose of this study was to describe the adverse events associated with IPDs.

Study Design: This was a retrospective review of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Finite element analysis is frequently used for lumbar spine biomechanical analysis. The primary scope of this work is to illustrate, using finite element analysis, how the biomechanical behavior of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), along with a novel combination of the interspinous process device (IPD) and pedicle screws, improves lumbar spine stability. : In this study, unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) and bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) were used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A novel interspinous fixation system based on anatomical parameters and incorporating transfacetopedicular screws, was developed to treat degenerative disc diseases. The biomechanical characteristics of the novel system were evaluated using finite element analysis in comparison to other classical interspinous spacers.

Methods: The L1-S1 lumbar spine finite element models were surgically implanted with the novel system, Coflex and DIAM devices at the L4/L5 segment to assess the range of motion, the pression distribution of intervertebral disc, the peak stresses on the spinous process and implant during various motions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In recent years, with the introduction of the concept of lumbar non-fusion, the interspinous device has emerged. The purpose of this study is to bibliometrically analyze the state, areas of interest, and emerging trends in the usage of interspinous devices for the treatment of lumbar degeneration disease, as well as related research fields. Between January 1, 2000 and June 14, 2023, a comprehensive collection of publications on the topic of interspinous devices in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease (IDTLDD) was procured from the Web of Science.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Perspective: Efficacy and outcomes for different lumbar interspinous devices (ISD) vs. open surgery to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Surg Neurol Int

January 2024

Assistant Clinical Professor of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Hospital, Long Island, NY, USA, 1122 Frankling Avenue Suite 106, Garden City, NY, USA.

Background: Interspinous devices (ISD) constitute a minimally invasive (MI) alternative to open surgery (i.e., laminectomy/decompression with/without fusion (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!