A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Characterization of Freshwater Diatom Communities: Comparing Taxonomic and Genetic-Fingerprinting Approaches. | LitMetric

Benthic diatom assemblages from five sampling sites located on two rivers were characterized simultaneously by means of traditional microscopic observations and PCR-DGGE fingerprinting with primers specifically designed for Bacillariophyceae. Community structure, richness, and diversity assessed by both methods were compared. Diatom lists obtained from morphological identification were separated into subsets, depending on (i) the taxonomic level considered (genus, species, variety) and, for each of them, (ii) the relative abundance (RA) of each component (the whole data set, RA > 1%, RA > 2%). These data were then compared to genetic fingerprinting data. Clusters based on taxonomic composition and DGGE banding patterns were very similar, showing good correspondence of community structure between the two methods. Data were compared by linear regressions between indices (richness, diversity) and by Mantel tests on dissimilarity matrices generated for each community composition data set. Statistical analysis indicated that the most reliable correlations with fingerprinting were obtained for genera representing more than 1% RA or species representing more than 2% RA. The results reveal that the PCR-DGGE protocol described here offers a satisfactory alternative for performing preliminary screening of coarse differences in diatom global community structure between samples. It can be regarded as a good complement to taxonomic analyses, which still remain necessary to detect precise changes in richness and diversity, especially when considering species with low abundance in natural assemblages.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

community structure
12
richness diversity
12
data set
8
data compared
8
data
5
characterization freshwater
4
diatom
4
freshwater diatom
4
diatom communities
4
communities comparing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!