Purpose: To evaluate how well partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster) and optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) (Lenstar LS 900) predict postoperative refractions using only the formulas that come preinstalled on the machines.
Setting: Private practice, Saint Joseph, Michigan, USA.
Design: Retrospective consecutive case series.
Methods: Eyes were measured with 2 biometers before cataract surgery. Six formulas were ranked by machine. Formulas were also ranked for extremely long and short eyes by averaging the ranks of 6 statistics (mean error, mean absolute error, standard deviation [SD], maximum error, and percentage of eyes within ±0.5 diopter [D] and ±1.0 D of prediction).
Results: Formulas were ranked by the SD of the prediction errors. The OLCR device outperformed the PCI device using the preinstalled formulas. The Olsen formula performed the best (0.378) but was preinstalled on the OLCR device only. Other formulas had the following SDs (OLCR device first, PCI device second): Haigis (0.393, 0.401), Holladay 1 (0.408, 0.414), Hoffer Q (0.428, 0.432), SRK/T (0.433, 0.440), and SRK II (0.623, 0.633). Rankings for long eye were (first to last) were Olsen, Haigis, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1. Rankings for short eyes were Olsen, Haigis, Holladay 1, SRK/T, and Hoffer Q.
Conclusions: The OLCR device outperformed the PCI device using the Olsen formula. The Olsen formula also ranked first for short eyes and long eyes. Other formulas performed about the same on both machines. The SRK II formula should be avoided.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.040 | DOI Listing |
Cesk Slov Oftalmol
December 2024
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the results of preoperative biometric data measured with optical biometers of different generations in patients with cataract. Lenstar optical biometry is based on the principle of optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and Anterion on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT).
Material And Methods: A total of 200 eyes (103 patients) were included in a prospective study at the Faculty Hospital in Trenčín the period from June 2023 to January 2024.
Sci Rep
October 2024
Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Institute, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
With the advancements in ocular biometric technology, there have been significant improvements in accurately and efficiently measuring ocular parameters. The aim of this study is to compare the reliability of biometric parameters obtained using a new frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) biometer with the measurements obtained from swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometers. This study employed an observational cross-sectional design.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Ophthalmol
October 2024
Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Background: To analyze the difference and agreement between measurements obtained by a new fully automatic optical biometer, the SW-9000 μm Plus, based on optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) and a commonly used optical biometer (Pentacam AXL) based on Scheimpflug imaging with partial coherence interferometry (PCI).
Methods: The central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD, from epithelium to anterior lens surface), lens thickness (LT), mean keratometry (K), corneal astigmatism, corneal diameter (CD), pupil diameter (PD), and axial length (AL) of 74 eyes (from 74 healthy subjects) were measured using the SW-9000 μm Plus and the Pentacam AXL to determine the agreement. Double angle plots were used for astigmatism vector analysis.
BMC Ophthalmol
March 2024
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
Background: This study evaluates the impact of corneal power on the accuracy of 14 newer intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in cataract surgery. The aim is to assess how these formulas perform across different corneal curvature ranges, thereby guiding more precise IOL selection.
Methods: In this retrospective case series, 336 eyes from 336 patients who underwent cataract surgery were studied.
Int Ophthalmol
February 2024
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, No. 7, Jinsui Road, Zhujiang Newtown, Guangzhou, China.
Purpose: This study evaluated the relationship between refractive outcomes and postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from corneal epithelium to lens) measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), and Scheimpflug devices under the undilated pupil.
Methods: Patients undergoing cataract phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a hospital setting were enrolled. Postoperative ACD (postACD) was performed with an SS-OCT device, an OLCR device, and a Scheimpflug device at least 1 month after cataract surgery.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!