The discussion with Rao and Nanjundiah about the history of interactions between J. B. S. Haldane and Ernst Mayr is further extended in this note. The nature of the dispute about beanbag genetics is explicated as consisting of two separate issues, one about the role of mathematical analysis in evolutionary biology, and the other about the value of single-locus genic models.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40656-016-0101-6 | DOI Listing |
J Genet
January 2021
Centre for Human Genetics, Electronic City, Bengaluru 560 100, India.
Hist Philos Life Sci
April 2016
Department of Philosophy, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 -1180, USA.
The discussion with Rao and Nanjundiah about the history of interactions between J. B. S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHist Philos Life Sci
April 2016
Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS), Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch University, Marais Street, Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa.
Ernst Mayr and J. B. S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hist Biol
October 2011
National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore 560012, India.
Starting from the early decades of the twentieth century, evolutionary biology began to acquire mathematical overtones. This took place via the development of a set of models in which the Darwinian picture of evolution was shown to be consistent with the laws of heredity discovered by Mendel. The models, which came to be elaborated over the years, define a field of study known as population genetics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!