AI Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to compare hearing thresholds and speech perception abilities between two age groups of patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.
- Based on a sample of 59 patients, the younger group had better audiometric results and speech perception scores compared to the older group, indicating age-related differences in outcomes.
- Both groups performed well with cochlear implants, but the younger group showed significantly better results, particularly in higher frequency thresholds and speech perception testing.
Article Abstract
Aim: To compare the audiometric thresholds and speech perception sentence test, between two groups with bilateral post-lingual, severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.
Methods: Retrospective and analytical study, with 59 patients divided into 2 groups (under 60 years and above 60 years old) implanted between May/2002 and February/2007.
Results: The first group (control) included 30 patients with a mean age of 44 years. The audiometric threshold value in this group was 26 dB, and the average value of speech perception test was 94%. The second group included 29 patients with a mean age of 69 years. The average audiometric threshold was 29 dB, and the average value of SPT was 90%. The Mann-Whitney U-test was considered significant (P<0.05) only for 6-8 KHz frequencies and for SPT.
Conclusion: Both groups had excellent outcomes in audiometric and speech testing with the use of CI, but with a significantly better performance in the adult group.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874609809666160322142817 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comparison of behind-the-ear vs. off-the-ear speech processors in cochlear implants: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Background: Cochlear implants (CI) with off-the-ear (OTE) and behind-the-ear (BTE) speech processors differ in user experience and audiological performance, impacting speech perception, comfort, and satisfaction.
Objectives: This systematic review explores audiological outcomes (speech perception in quiet and noise) and non-audiological factors (device handling, comfort, cosmetics, overall satisfaction) of OTE and BTE speech processors in CI recipients.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA-S guidelines, examining Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Accuracy and variability in clinical predictions of speech recognition outcomes for cochlear implant users.
Int J Audiol
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Objectives: An improvement in speech perception is a major well-documented benefit of cochlear implantation (CI), which is commonly discussed with CI candidates to set expectations. However, a large variability exists in speech perception outcomes. We evaluated the accuracy of clinical predictions of post-CI speech perception scores.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCorrigendum: The influence of temperament and perinatal factors on language development: a longitudinal study.
Front Psychol
January 2025
Institute for General and Hungarian Linguistics, HUN-REN Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest, Hungary.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImproving auditory attention decoding by classifying intracranial responses to glimpsed and masked acoustic events.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb)
April 2024
Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Listeners with hearing loss have trouble following a conversation in multitalker environments. While modern hearing aids can generally amplify speech, these devices are unable to tune into a target speaker without first knowing to which speaker a user aims to attend. Brain-controlled hearing aids have been proposed using auditory attention decoding (AAD) methods, but current methods use the same model to compare the speech stimulus and neural response, regardless of the dynamic overlap between talkers which is known to influence neural encoding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInterventions That Failed: Factors Associated with the Continuation of Bullying After a Targeted Intervention.
Int J Bullying Prev
April 2023
INVEST Flagship Research Center/Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
We examined how often teachers' targeted interventions fail in stopping bullying and to what extent this varies between schools vs. between students involved. In addition, we investigated which student-level factors were associated with intervention failure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!