Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: a single surgeon's experience.

J Robot Surg

Laparoscopic Center of South Florida, Jackson South Community Hospital, 9195 Sunset Drive, Suite 230, Miami, FL, 33173, USA.

Published: June 2013

There is increased interest in robotic techniques for colon resection, but the role of robotics in colorectal surgery has not yet been defined. The purpose of this study was to compare our recent experience with robotic right colectomy to that with laparoscopic right colectomy. From November 2008 to June 2011, a total of 47 consecutive patients underwent elective, right colectomy: 25 laparoscopic right colectomies (LRC) and 22 robotic right colectomies (RRC). All procedures in this study were performed by a single, board-certified colon and rectal surgeon (H.J.L.). Main outcomes recorded included conversion rate, operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of extraction sites, length of stay (LOS), and complications. Data studied were prospectively recorded in a database and were retrospectively reviewed. Mean OT for LRC was 107 ± 36.7 min (median 98, range 48-207) and for RRC was 189.1 ± 38.1 min (median 185, range 123-288, P < 0.001). Mean total operating room time (TORT) for LRC was 158.6 ± 38.1 min (median 149, range 104-274) and for RRC was 258.3 ± 40.9 (median 251, range 182-372, P < 0.001). The tendency lines for both OT and TORT decreased over time for RRC. EBL for LRC was 70.2 ± 52.9 ml (median 50, range 10-200) and for RRC was 60.8 ± 71.3 ml (median 40, range 10-300, P = 0.037). The mean extraction site length for the laparoscopic group was 5.3 ± 1.3 cm (median 5, range 4-11) and for the robotic group was 4.6 ± 0.7 cm (median 4.5, range 3.5-6, p = 0.008). LOS was similar for both groups, as were complications. No cases were converted to open. No leaks occurred and there was no 30-day mortality. RRC is safe and feasible, with similar outcomes to LRC. Operative times were longer for RRC; however, they compare favorably with times for LRC published in the literature. Extraction site length and EBL were less for RRC. However, further study is necessary to demonstrate the clinical relevance of these findings. We are optimistic that OT and TORT will continue to improve.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0320-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

robotic colectomy
8
colectomy laparoscopic
8
laparoscopic versus
4
robotic
4
versus robotic
4
colectomy
4
colectomy single
4
single surgeon's
4
surgeon's experience
4
experience increased
4

Similar Publications

Aim: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is an oncologically driven technique for treating right colon cancer. While laparoscopic CME is technically demanding and has been associated with more complications, the robotic approach might reduce morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of stepwise implementation of robotic CME.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Complete mesocolon excision (CME) and central vascular ligation for right colonic cancers have been developed to improve oncological outcomes. However, it has been linked with a higher risk of morbidity and technical difficulties in operating near major vessels. This study investigated the impact of preoperative surgical planning utilizing CT reconstruction on surgical outcomes in right colectomy with CME.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Senhance digital laparoscopic system (Senhance) is a surgical robot approved for use in Japan after the da Vinci system. Our institution was the first to introduce this system, which has been used primarily for gastrointestinal surgery. Featuring tactile feedback, eye-movement-controlled camera operation, stereoscopic vision, and magnification, the short-term postoperative outcomes of the Senhance in abdominal surgery have been documented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Colorectal surgical procedures may benefit from a minimally invasive approach in children, although there are few studies.

Methods: A retrospective, single-centre observational study was conducted on paediatric patients who underwent colorectal robotic-assisted surgery between 2011 and 2022.

Results: A total of 50 patients (33 male; 17 female) were included, with a median age of 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Advancements in robotic technology have revolutionized general surgery, with new platforms and continuous improvements enhancing surgical procedures. Our unit adopted the Da Vinci Si model in 2012 and later the X model for various abdominal surgeries. In early 2023, we integrated the Hugo RAS system by Medtronic into our practice following comprehensive training.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!