The German Hypertension League (Deutsche Hochdruckliga) Quality Seal Protocol for blood pressure-measuring devices: 15-year experience and results from 105 devices for home blood pressure control.

Blood Press Monit

aDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Karl-Leisner Clinic, St Antonius Hospital, Kleve bCentre of Hypertension, St Josef Hospital cInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg dCharité University Clinic, Helios Clinic Berlin-Buch, Berlin eDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre NRW, Bad Oeynhausen fCentre of Rehabilitation, Kerckhoff-Clinic, Bad Nauheim gDepartment of Nephrology and Dialysis, Helios Clinic, Schwerin hDepartment of Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda, Wuppertal iMedical Practice of Internal Medicine, Cuxhaven, Germany.

Published: August 2016

Objective: The German Hypertension League (Deutsche Hochdruckliga) established a program to assess the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure (BP)-measuring devices in 1999 (Quality Seal Protocol). Here, we report on the results of a testing series of 105 devices designed for BP self-measurement.

Methods: The test protocol for the validation of upper-arm, wrist, and finger devices was developed to compare device to conventional Riva-Rocci measurements based on five criteria: mean systolic and mean diastolic differences, their standard deviations, and a point score representing the correlation of systolic and diastolic errors of individual comparisons. The results of this testing are summarized.

Results: From 1999 to 2014, a total of 105 BP devices for self-measurement were tested according to the Quality Seal Protocol. Of these, 47.6% fulfilled all five validation criteria, 55.7% of the upper-arm devices (39 of 71) and 32.4% (11 of 34) of the wrist devices. Finger devices were not offered for testing. Forty-four devices (41.9%) failed multiple test criteria of the validation procedure. A subanalysis with 51 devices tested showed that a stricter definition of the passing point score with a limit of at least 55% would slightly increase the consistency with the conventional criteria in comparison with a point score criterion of at least 50%. It was therefore introduced in 2007.

Conclusion: The results indicate the importance of a rigorous testing of a BP-measuring device used for home BP measurement to prevent patients from making erroneous treatment decisions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000186DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality seal
12
seal protocol
12
105 devices
12
point score
12
devices
11
german hypertension
8
hypertension league
8
league deutsche
8
deutsche hochdruckliga
8
blood pressure
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!