Few studies examine the effect of interpersonal, regulatory or legal coercion on the treatment of depressive symptoms. This retrospective case-control study compared the recovery rates of 574 adults whose level of coercion was scored on a 0-3 scale from fully voluntary to severe coercion when admitted to the Menninger Clinic between 2009 and 2014. The change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores (measuring depression severity) from admission to discharge served as the primary outcome measure. Level of coercion was not associated with a difference in rate of improvement in PHQ-9 score. Greater improvement in PHQ-9 scores was associated with (a) older age, (b) lack of a psychotic spectrum disorder diagnosis, (c) stronger working alliance with treatment team, and (d) less difficulty with emotional regulation [lower Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) scores]. DERS scores were the most impactful factor. This study suggests that licensure boards can continue to mandate treatment despite concerns that coercion may decrease treatment effectiveness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9433-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

level coercion
12
phq-9 scores
8
improvement phq-9
8
coercion
6
treatment
5
systematic analysis
4
analysis treatment
4
treatment effects
4
effects depressive
4
depressive symptom
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!