A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effect of stent placement for May-Thurner syndrome combined with symptomatic superficial venous reflux disease. | LitMetric

The effect of stent placement for May-Thurner syndrome combined with symptomatic superficial venous reflux disease.

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord

Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Published: April 2015

Objective: The current study aimed to determine whether it is necessary to correct May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) simultaneously with superficial venous reflux disease (S-VRD) in limbs of combined symptomatic MTS/S-VRD.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with S-VRD combined with MTS was conducted in a single institution from January 2001 to December 2010. Doppler ultrasound and phlebography were performed in patients with VRD. Computed tomography angiography or transfemoral venography was selectively performed in patients with severe symptoms or findings on phlebography suggestive of MTS. MTS was found in 207 patients. Among these, 121 patients were successfully treated with stent placement combined with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA); the remaining 86 patients, who were treated with EVLA for S-VRD alone, served as a control group. Clinical results, venous reflux, and quality of life were evaluated before and after treatment. Stent patency was followed up with Doppler ultrasound.

Results: There was no significant difference in age, female to male ratio, clinical symptoms, comorbidities, or percentage with S-VRD between the two groups. A total of 125 stents were placed in 121 patients in the EVLA + stent group. The rate of technical success was 100%. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 91 months (mean, 70.4 ± 21.3 months). The 4-year primary patency rate was 93.3%. The incidence of pain, edema, and ulceration was decreased significantly in the stent + EVLA group. However, there was a high rate of S-VRD recurrence in the EVLA-alone group. Quality of life improved significantly in the EVLA + stent group; improvements included relief of pain, edema, and fatigue and increased physical activity. For deep venous reflux, there was no significant improvement after stent placement for MTS.

Conclusions: Stent placement is an effective and durable treatment of MTS combined with symptomatic S-VRD; it results in a high level of long-term patency and a significant relief of pain, edema, and ulceration. Furthermore, correction of MTS plays an important role in decreasing the recurrence rate of S-VRD after EVLA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.11.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stent placement
16
venous reflux
16
combined symptomatic
12
pain edema
12
stent
8
may-thurner syndrome
8
superficial venous
8
reflux disease
8
performed patients
8
121 patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!