Introduction: Despite evidence from prospective trials and meta-analyses supporting laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LP) over open pyloromyotomy (OP), the open technique is still utilized by some surgeons on the premise that there is minimal clinical benefit to LP over OP. Although the potential cosmetic benefit of LP over OP is often cited in reports, it has never been objectively evaluated.
Methods: After internal review board approval, the parents of patients from a previous prospective trial who had undergone LP (n = 9) and OP (n = 10) were contacted. After consent was obtained, the parents and patients were asked to complete a validated scar scoring questionnaire that was compared between groups. Standardized photos were taken of study subjects and controls with no abdominal procedures. Blinded volunteers were recruited to view the photos, identify if scars were present, and complete questions if a scar(s) was seen. Volunteers were also asked about the degree of satisfaction if their child had similar scars on a four-point scale from happy to unacceptable.
Results: Mean age was 7 years in both groups. Parental scar assessment scores were superior in the LP group in every category. Blinded volunteers detected abdominal scars significantly more often in the OP group (98%) vs. the LP group (28%; P < .001). The volunteers detected a scar in 16% of the controls, comparable to the 28% detected in the LP group (P = .17). The degree of satisfaction estimate by volunteers was 1.78 for OP and 1.02 for LP and controls, generating a Cohen's d effect size of 5.1 standard deviation units comparing OP to either LP or controls (very large ≥1.3).
Conclusions: Parents of children scored LP scars superior to OP scars. Surgical scars are almost always identifiable with OP while the surgical scars associated with LP approach invisibility to the observer, appearing similar to patients with no prior abdominal operation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0566 | DOI Listing |
J Pediatr Surg
November 2024
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Surg Endosc
October 2024
Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Background: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication after esophagectomy. BOTOX injections and pyloric surgeries (PS), including pyloroplasty (PP) and pyloromyotomy (PM), are performed intraoperatively as prophylaxis against DGE. This study compares the effects of pyloric BOTOX injection and PS for preventing DGE post-esophagectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Surg Res
July 2024
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address:
J Pediatr Surg
February 2024
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
Aim Of The Study: We describe the short- and medium-term outcomes following open and laparoscopic assisted oesophageal replacement surgery in a single tertiary paediatric surgical centre.
Methods: A retrospective review (institutional audit approval no. 3213) on patients who underwent open or laparoscopic-assisted oesophageal replacement (OAR vs.
Int J Surg Case Rep
December 2023
Faculty of Clinical Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgery, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.
Introduction And Importance: The association in the occurrence of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is 0.25 % to 0.44 % between monozygotic twins and 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!