We develop a Bayesian approach to determine the most probable structural ensemble model from candidate structures for intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) that takes full advantage of NMR chemical shifts and J-coupling data, their known errors and variances, and the quality of the theoretical back-calculation from structure to experimental observables. Our approach differs from previous formulations in the optimization of experimental and back-calculation nuisance parameters that are treated as random variables with known distributions, as opposed to structural or ensemble weight optimization or use of a reference ensemble. The resulting experimental inferential structure determination (EISD) method is size extensive with O(N) scaling, with N = number of structures, that allows for the rapid ranking of large ensemble data comprising tens of thousands of conformations. We apply the EISD approach on singular folded proteins and a corresponding set of ∼25 000 misfolded states to illustrate the problems that can arise using Boltzmann weighted priors. We then apply the EISD method to rank IDP ensembles most consistent with the NMR data and show that the primary error for ranking or creating good IDP ensembles resides in the poor back-calculation from structure to simulated experimental observable. We show that a reduction by a factor of 3 in the uncertainty of the back-calculation error can improve the discrimination among qualitatively different IDP ensembles for the amyloid-beta peptide.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b00351 | DOI Listing |
Intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs or IDRs) exist as ensembles of conformations in the monomeric state and can adopt diverse binding modes, making their experimental and computational characterization challenging. Here, we developed Disobind, a deep-learning method that predicts inter-protein contact maps and interface residues for an IDR and a partner protein, leveraging sequence embeddings from a protein language model. Several current methods, in contrast, provide partner-independent predictions, require the structure of either protein, and/or are limited by the MSA quality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDetermining accurate atomic resolution conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is extremely challenging. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations provide atomistic conformational ensembles of IDPs, but their accuracy is highly dependent on the quality of physical models, or force fields, used. Here, we demonstrate how to determine accurate atomic resolution conformational ensembles of IDPs by integrating all-atom MD simulations with experimental data from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) with a simple, robust and fully automated maximum entropy reweighting procedure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
December 2024
Biocenter, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz 55128, Germany.
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) adopt ensembles of rapidly fluctuating heterogeneous conformations, influencing their binding capabilities and supramolecular transitions. The primary conformational descriptors for understanding IDP ensembles-the radius of gyration (), measured by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and the root mean square (rms) end-to-end distance (), probed by fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET)-are often reported to produce inconsistent results regarding IDP expansion as a function of denaturant concentration in the buffer. This ongoing debate surrounding the FRET-SAXS discrepancy raises questions about the overall reliability of either method for quantitatively studying IDP properties.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFElife
November 2024
Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, United States.
The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFbioRxiv
November 2024
College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA.
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) perform a wide range of biological functions without adopting stable, well-defined, three-dimensional structures. Instead, IDPs exist as dynamic ensembles of flexible conformations, traditionally thought to be governed by weak, nonspecific interactions, which are well described by homopolymer theory. However, recent research highlights the presence of transient, specific interactions in several IDPs, suggesting that factors beyond overall size influence their conformational behavior.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!