In the present study we have evaluated a possible stress reaction in response to two different PGF2α analogs-luprostiol and D-cloprostenol--and their effects on estrous cycle characteristics. In a cross-over-design eight mares received in alternating order either luprostiol (Treatment LUP; 3.75 mg im), D-cloprostenol (Treatment CLO; 22.5μg im) or saline (Treatment CON; NaCl 0.9% 0.5ml im) on day 8 after ovulation. Injection of either LUP or CLO, but not of CON resulted in a significant decline of progesterone concentration in plasma to baseline concentrations within two days (time: p<0.001, treatment: p<0.01, time × treatment: p<0.05). The treatment to ovulation interval was significantly shorter in LUP and CLO than in CON cycles (LUP: 9.4 ± 0.4 d; CLO: 9.4 ± 1.3 d; CON: 16.1 ± 0.8 d; p<0.001). Injection of either LUP or CLO, but not of CON significantly increased salivary cortisol concentration (immediately before injection: CON 1.3 ± 0.2, LUP 1.4 ± 0.3, CLO 1.4 ± 0.3 ng/ml; 60 min after injection: CON 1.0 ± 0.3, LUP 8.0 ± 1.4, CLO 4.2 ± 0.7 ng/ml; time: p<0.01, treatment: p<0.001, time × treatment: p<0.001). Heart rate decreased over time (p<0.05) independent of treatment and no changes in heart rate variability were detected. Injection of the PGF2α analogs CLO and LUP reliably induced luteolysis and apart from a transient increase in salivary cortisol concentration no signs of a physiological stress response or apparent side effects occurred.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.02.031DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pgf2α agonists
4
agonists luprostiol
4
luprostiol d-cloprostenol
4
d-cloprostenol reliably
4
reliably induce
4
induce luteolysis
4
luteolysis luteal
4
luteal phase
4
phase mares
4
mares evoking
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!