Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: to compare the benefit of a personalised outpatient therapy prescribed upon discharge by the cardiology unit to the patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent or bare-metal stent vs. the usual practice.
Design: controlled, multicentre, non-randomized study that enrolled patients who underwent coronary stent implantation and treated in the year after stent implantation with two protocols: the treatment group received Clopidogrel directly from the cardiology unit at each monitoring visit; the control group received a prescription for outpatient treatment through the standard retail pharmacy channel.
Setting And Participants: the recruited centres adopting the new treatment protocol are Magenta, Legnano, and Rho (ASL Milano1, Magenta - Lombardy Region, Northern Italy), with 477 patients included; the recruited centres following for the standard protocol are Niguarda and San Carlo (ASL Milano), with 307 patients included. We identified all patients aged ≥40 years, discharged after coronary stent implantation between January 1st, 2010 and March 31st, 2011, and followed for 1 year.
Main Outcome Measures: all coronary events, second coronary interventions or deaths in the year after hospital discharge.
Results: we found differences between the two treatments in relation with coronary events: hazard ratio (HR) for the control group in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is 3.32 (95%CI 1.67- 6.62), HR in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is 2.44 (95%CI 1.07-5.57). The compliance at 1 year is 80% in the treated group vs. 70% in the control group, respectively (p-value <0.01).
Conclusions: the application of the therapeutic plan, governed by the interventional cardiology, increases treatment adherence and reduces the risk of cardiovascular events subsequent to the insertion of a stent. It is crucial, therefore, to improve the adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy by using high levels of integration between inpatient and outpatient care to reduce adverse health outcomes during post-surgery phase and to ensure the taking in charge of the patient.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.19191/EP16.1.P051.014 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!