Long-term Follow-up of Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Spare-the-Nephron-Trial.

Transplantation

1 School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD. 2 Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 3 Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI. 4 California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA. 5 University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. 6 Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. 7 University of Colorado, Denver, CO. 8 Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 9 Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 10 St. Barnabas Medical Center, Newark, NJ. 11 University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 12 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. 13 Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Camden, NJ. 14 CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Cincinatti, OH.

Published: January 2017

In the Spare-the-Nephron (STN) Study, kidney transplant recipients randomized about 115 days posttransplant to convert from CNI (calcineurin inhibitor)/MMF to sirolimus (SRL)/MMF had a significantly greater improvement in measured GFR (mGFR) at 12 months compared with those kept on CNI/MMF. The difference at 24 months was not statistically significant. From 14 top enrolling centers, 128 of 175 patients identified with a functioning graft at 2 years consented to enroll in an observational, noninterventional extension study to collect retrospectively and prospectively annual follow-up data for the interval since baseline (completion of the parent STN study at 24 months posttransplant). Overall, 11 patients died, including 5 (7.6%) in the SRL/MMF group and 6 (9.7%) in the CNI/MMF group. Twenty-two grafts have been lost including 10 (15.2%) in the SRL/MMF arm and 12 (19.4%) in the CNI/MMF arm. Death and chronic rejection were the most common causes of graft loss in both arms. There were modestly more cardiovascular events in the MMF/SRL group. Estimated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) from baseline out to 6 additional years (8 years posttransplant, ITT analysis, SRL/MMF, n = 34; CNI/MMF, n = 26) was 63.2 ± 28.5 mL/min/1.73 m in the SRL/MMF group and 59.2 ± 27.2 mL/min/1.73 m in the CNI/MMF group and was not statistically significant, but there is a clinically meaningful trend for improved long-term renal function in the SRL/MMF group compared with the CNI/MMF group. The long-term decision for immunosuppression needs to be carefully individualized.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001098DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

srl/mmf group
12
cni/mmf group
12
kidney transplant
8
transplant recipients
8
stn study
8
compared cni/mmf
8
group
7
srl/mmf
6
cni/mmf
6
long-term follow-up
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!