In our response to the 27 commentaries, we refine the theoretical claims, clarify several misconceptions of our framework, and explore substantial disagreements. In doing so, we (1) show that our framework accommodates multiple historical scenarios; (2) debate the historical evidence, particularly about "pre-Axial" religions; (3) offer important details about cultural evolutionary theory; (4) clarify the term prosociality; and (4) discuss proximal mechanisms. We review many interesting extensions, amplifications, and qualifications of our approach made by the commentators.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000655 | DOI Listing |
Sci Adv
January 2025
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Cross-feeding involves microbes consuming exudates of other surrounding microbes, mediating elemental cycling. Characterizing the diversity of cross-feeding pathways in ocean microbes illuminates evolutionary forces driving self-organization of ocean ecosystems. Here, we uncover a purine and pyrimidine cross-feeding network in globally abundant groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Plant Biol
January 2025
Graduate Program in Translational Agricultural Sciences, National Cheng Kung University and Academia Sinica, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Behav Brain Sci
January 2025
Département d'études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS, Paris,
The commentaries addressed various aspects of our account of historical myths. We respond by clarifying the evolutionary theory of coalitional psychology that underlies our claims (R1). This addresses concerns about the role of fitness interdependence in large groups (R2), cultural transmission processes (R3), alternative routes to nation-building (R4) and the role of proximal mechanisms (R5).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
December 2024
MTA-DE "Momentum" Ecology, Evolution & Developmental Biology Research Group, Dept. of Evolutionary Zoology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
The objective to study the influence of microbiome on host fitness is frequently constrained by spatial and temporal variability of microbial communities. In particular, the environment serves as a dynamic reservoir of microbes that provides potential colonizers for animal microbiomes. In this study, we analyzed the microbiome of Hydra oligactis and corresponding water samples from 15 Hungarian lakes to reveal the contribution of environmental microbiota on host microbiome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEcol Lett
January 2025
Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Microorganisms underpin numerous ecosystem processes and support biodiversity globally. Yet, we understand surprisingly little about what structures environmental microbiomes, including how to efficiently identify key players. Microbiome network theory predicts that highly connected hubs act as keystones, but this has never been empirically tested in nature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!