Effect of Immediate Compared With Delayed Insertion of Etonogestrel Implants on Medical Abortion Efficacy and Repeat Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Obstet Gynecol

Gynuity Health Projects, New York, New York; the Departments of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Secretariat of Health, Mexico City, Mexico; Planned Parenthood of Southern New England, New Haven, Connecticut; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts; Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest, San Diego, California; Planned Parenthood Northern California, San Rafael, California; and Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Published: February 2016

Objective: To evaluate the effect of insertion of etonogestrel implants with mifepristone compared with after the abortion on the risks of medical abortion failure and repeat pregnancy over the subsequent 6 months.

Methods: In a randomized trial, we assigned patients undergoing medical abortion to receive etonogestrel implants either with the mifepristone (Quickstart group) or after the abortion (Afterstart group). We followed them for 7 months to ascertain abortion outcome, pregnancies, and contraception use.

Results: Between September 2013 and August 2014, we enrolled 236 participants in the Quickstart group and 240 in the Afterstart group. To examine abortion failure, we conducted a noninferiority analysis from which we excluded nine participants who had missing outcome data and four with specified protocol violations. Of the rest, 9 of 229 (3.9%) and 9 of 234 (3.8%) in the Quickstart and Afterstart groups, respectively, had surgery to complete the abortion; the difference of 0.08% (90% confidence interval -3.1% to 3.3%) excluded our prestipulated noninferiority margin of 5 percentage points. Among participants with pregnancy follow-up through 6 months, 1 of 213 (0.5%) and 3 of 208 (1.4%) in the Quickstart and Afterstart groups, respectively, became pregnant within that time; 6-month pregnancy rates did not differ significantly by group (exact log-rank test, P=.28). At enrollment, significantly more participants in the Quickstart group than in the Afterstart group were satisfied with their group assignments (187/236 [79%] compared with 129/240 [54%], respectively; P<.001).

Conclusion: Insertion of etonogestrel implants with mifepristone did not appreciably increase medical abortion failure risk and it enhanced patient satisfaction, but we found no evidence that it decreased repeat pregnancy rates.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01902485.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001274DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

etonogestrel implants
12
medical abortion
12
quickstart group
12
afterstart group
12
insertion etonogestrel
8
abortion
8
repeat pregnancy
8
implants mifepristone
8
abortion failure
8
group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!