Carbetocin versus oxytocin to reduce additional uterotonic use at non-elective caesarean section: a double-blind, randomised trial (.).

Objective: We compared the efficacy of Carbetocin (long-acting oxytocin receptor agonist) versus Oxytocin given at non-elective caesarean section.

Method: We performed a double-blind, randomised, single-centre study. Eligible women were ≥37 weeks of gestation undergoing emergency caesarean section. Participants received either carbetocin of 100 μg or oxytocin 5 international units. The primary outcome was the need to administer additional uterotonics, as determined by the clinician. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, haemoglobin drop pre-post operation and the need for a blood transfusion Results: From August 2012 to February 2013, 114 women were enroled. Two were excluded from analysis as they received a general anaesthetic. Fifty-nine patients received 100-μg carbetocin; 53 received 5 international units oxytocin. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of women requiring additional uterotonics between the two groups: Carbetocin group 22% and Oxytocin group 13% (p = 0.323). There were no significant differences in the fall in haemoglobin, estimated blood loss, rates of post-partum haemorrhage or blood transfusions.

Conclusion: Oxytocin and carbetocin have similar requirements for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, haemoglobin drop and blood transfusions. There was a trend towards requiring additional uterotonics in patients receiving Carbetocin which was not statistically significant. This study found no benefits in using carbetocin over oxytocin.