Objective: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a common procedure used to treat various lumbar degenerative pathologies. The purpose of this study is to describe 30-day postoperative outcomes following ALIF on a national scale.
Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) was searched for ALIF patients between 2005 and 2011. The top preoperative diagnoses were determined using ICD-9 codes. All available 30-day complications were grouped as overall composite morbidity and were compared between preoperative diagnosis groups by univariable and multivariable analyses.
Results: There were a total of 1352 ALIF patients. Overall, 6.73% of patients experienced a postoperative complication. Unplanned reoperations (2.48%), urinary tract infection (1.55%), superficial surgical site infection (1.41%), and sepsis (1.11%) were the most common morbidity events. The morbidity rates for each sub-group were: intervertebral disc degeneration (4.41%), spondylosis (6.72%), lumbosacral spinal stenosis(8.21%), and spondylolisthesis (8.41%). After extensive adjustment for patient characteristics and preoperative morbidities, multivariable analysis revealed spondylolisthesis (OR=3.29; 95% CI:1.04-10.46) and spinal stenosis (OR=3.76; 95% CI:1.33-10.63) to be associated with significantly higher overall morbidity odds when compared with lumbar disc degeneration. Lumbosacral spondylosis was associated with similar outcomes as degenerative disc disease (OR =1.70; 95% CI:0.48-6.06).
Conclusions: Diverse postoperative complications need to be managed following ALIF. Patients with spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis may carry increased 30-day postoperative morbidity profiles in ALIF when compared to those with degenerative disc disease. Prospective studies are needed to better delineate the outcomes of ALIF procedures, particularly in the spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis patient populations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.02.024 | DOI Listing |
Global Spine J
January 2025
Research & Development, Endospine SLU, Andorra la Vella, Andorra.
Study Design: Exploratory prospective observational case-control study.
Objectives: Aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic outcome, as well as peri-operative complications, of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and full-endoscopic/percutaneous trans-Kambin transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (pTLIF) with a large-footprint interbody cage.
Methods: Patients that underwent elective ALIF and pTLIF with a large-footprint interbody cage were prospectively evaluated.
J Spine Surg
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Neuroscience Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an anterior surgical approach for interbody fusion in the lumbar spine which affords the surgeon unfettered access to the disc space and allows for release of the anterior longitudinal ligament and insertion of a large, lordotic interbody graft. Despite the benefits associated with ALIF when compared with other lumbar interbody fusion techniques, the ALIF approach is associated with a number of unique complications, and certain patient-specific criteria (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Spine Surg
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Background: A limited number of studies have compared the outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. This study aims to compare postoperative complications between these two surgical approaches.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed using a large national database.
Spine J
January 2025
Hoag Orthopedics, 16300 Sand Canyon Ave., Suite. 500, Irvine, CA 92618, USA.
Background Context: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a common surgical intervention for treating lumbar degenerative disorders. Increasing demand has contributed to ever-increasing healthcare expenditure and economic burden. To address this, cost-utility analyses (CUAs) compare value in the context of patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurochirurgie
December 2024
Aix Marseille Univ, APM, UH Timone, Department of Neurosurgery, Marseille, France.
Background: The Da Vinci robot ® (DVR), released in the early 2000s, provided a set of innovation aiming at pushing minimally invasive surgery forward. Its stereoscopic magnified visualization camera, motions that exceed the natural range of the human hand, or tremor reduction enhanced the surgeon's skills and added value in many surgical fields.
Objective: To map the current use of the DVR in spine surgery, identify gaps, address its limits and future perspectives.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!