AI Article Synopsis

  • This study focuses on prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling related to Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) in a family; the mother was referred due to abnormal fetal ultrasound findings after having a son with WHS features.
  • Genetic analysis techniques, specifically MLPA and aCGH, were used to identify the same genetic deletions and duplications in both the fetus and the mother's previous son, revealing significant microdeletions on chromosome 4.
  • The findings suggest that using these advanced genetic testing methods is crucial for diagnosing recurrent WHS, emphasizing the importance of prenatal monitoring and counseling for families with a history of the syndrome.

Article Abstract

Objective: We present prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling, and molecular cytogenetic features of familial recurrence of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS).

Materials And Methods: A 31-year-old woman was referred to a hospital at 24 weeks of gestation because of abnormal ultrasound findings in the fetus. Her first child was a boy who had growth retardation, mental defect, and a distinctive facial appearance. Based on the conventional cytogenetic analysis, the combined use of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) facilitated the prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling in the fetus. Results of the standard G-banging karyotype analysis of the fetus, the parents, and the boy were normal.

Results: The MLPA analysis revealed the same 4p microdeletion accompanied by 2p microduplication in the fetus and the boy. The aCGH analysis revealed a 3.57-Mb 4p16.3 microdeletion or arr [hg19] 4p16.3 (71,552-3,636,893) x1 in the fetus and a 3.29-Mb 4p16.3 microdeletion or arr [hg19] 4p16.3 (71,148-3,360,737) x1 in the boy. The 3.57-Mb 4p16.3 microdeletion encompassed 39 OMIM genes. The 3.29-Mb 4p16.3 microdeletion encompassed 36 OMIM genes. They both included LETM1 and WHSC1. The 2p25.3 microduplication was smaller than 666 kb and encompassed only one OMIM gene, ACP1.

Conclusion: The combined use of MLPA and aCGH is an effective way to diagnose recurrent WHS. Although WHS is typically caused by a de novo deletion, prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling are necessary in the next pregnancy in families that have suffered such cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.12.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

4p163 microdeletion
20
prenatal diagnosis
12
diagnosis genetic
12
genetic counseling
12
encompassed omim
12
2p253 microduplication
8
multiplex ligation-dependent
8
ligation-dependent probe
8
probe amplification
8
array comparative
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!