AI Article Synopsis

  • Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been the primary method for assessing lymph node status in breast cancer, but many patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) do not benefit from additional ALND due to low rates of metastases in non-sentinel nodes (non-SLN).
  • A study analyzed data from 163 patients to determine which clinical and pathological factors, such as age, tumor stage, and receptor status, could predict the likelihood of non-SLN metastases in those with positive SLN.
  • The findings revealed that only the stage of the tumor was a significant predictor for metastasis in non-SLN, with a notable increase in the ratio of non-SLN positive to negative nodes in more advanced disease stages.

Article Abstract

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has traditionally been the principal method for evaluating axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. In the past decades sentinel lymph nodes biopsy after lymphatic mapping has been used to stage the disease. The majority of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) positive patients do not have additional metastases in non-sentinel nodes (non-SLN) after additional ALND. These patients are exposed to the morbidity of ALND without any benefit from additional axillary clearence. In the present study we would like to asses the criteria for selecting those patients, who have high risk for non-SLN metastases in the axilla in cases of positive SLN. In this retrospective analysis, clinical and pathologic data from 163 patients who underwent SLN biopsy followed by ALND were collected. Following clinical and pathological characteristics were analyzed to predict the likehood of non-SLN metastases: age, staging, histologic type and grading of the tumors, hormonal receptor status, HER-2 receptor status and Ki-67 protein, angioinvasion, metastases in SLN and non-SLN. Relative frequencies of individual characteristics between sample groups were statistically tested by Chi-square test at significance level p=0.5, when sample sizes in groups were small (≤5) by Fisher´s exact test. Metastasis in SLN were present in 67 (41%) of patients, 48 patients (29,4%) had metastasis also in non-SLN. The ratio between non-SLN positive / non-SLN negative lymph nodes in patients with positive SLN increases with the stage of the disease, the difference between values for the pT1c and pT2 stadium was statistically significant (p = 0.0296). The same applies to grading, but the differences were not significant (p>0.05). We could not find significant differences for angioinvasion of the tumor, probably for small number of patients with angioinvasion (p>0.05).Only the stage of the tumor was shown to be significant in predicting the metastasis in non-SLN in our group of breast cancer patients with positive SLN Nearly 80% of the patients of 70 years and older displayed no benefit from axillary staging, because of negative SLN as well as non-SLN, although thanks to the small sample size this was not a statistically significant result. Furthermore, current recommendations for axillary staging in breast cancer patients are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4149/312_150922N497DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
16
cancer patients
16
lymph nodes
16
patients
13
lymph node
12
patients positive
12
sentinel lymph
12
positive sln
12
non-sln
9
axillary lymph
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!