Rankings of scholarly journals based on citation data are often met with scepticism by the scientific community. Part of the scepticism is due to disparity between the common perception of journals' prestige and their ranking based on citation counts. A more serious concern is the inappropriate use of journal rankings to evaluate the scientific influence of researchers. The paper focuses on analysis of the table of cross-citations among a selection of statistics journals. Data are collected from the database published by Thomson Reuters. Our results suggest that modelling the exchange of citations between journals is useful to highlight the most prestigious journals, but also that journal citation data are characterized by considerable heterogeneity, which needs to be properly summarized. Inferential conclusions require care to avoid potential overinterpretation of insignificant differences between journal ratings. Comparison with published ratings of institutions from the UK's research assessment exercise shows strong correlation at aggregate level between assessed research quality and journal citation 'export scores' within the discipline of statistics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4755202 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12124 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Digital Information Exchange Between the Public and Researchers in Health Studies: Scoping Review.
J Med Internet Res
January 2025
Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Background: Information exchange regarding the scope and content of health studies is becoming increasingly important. Digital methods, including study websites, can facilitate such an exchange.
Objective: This scoping review aimed to describe how digital information exchange occurs between the public and researchers in health studies.
Pooled prevalence and associated factors of traditional uvulectom among children in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Background: Traditional childhood uvulectomy (TCU) is an unregulated cultural practice associated with significant health risks, including infections, anemia, aspiration, and oral or pharyngeal injuries. The reuse of unsafe tools such as blades, needles, or thread loops exacerbates the spread of infectious diseases like HIV and hepatitis B. Despite its clinical significance, the pooled prevalence and associated factors of TCU have not been adequately examined through systematic reviews or meta-analyses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTop 100 most-cited articles on apoptosis of non-small cell lung cancer over the past two decades: a bibliometrics analysis.
Front Immunol
January 2025
First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Background: Recently there has been an increasing number of studies have explored apoptosis mechanisms in lung cancer (LC). However, no researchers have conducted a bibliometric analysis of the most cited articles in this field.
Objective: To examine the top 100 most influential and cited publications on apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from 2004 to 2023, summarizing research trends and key focus areas.
Fecal methylated syndecan-2 () testing for early screening of colorectal cancerous and precancerous lesions: A real-world retrospective study in China.
Cancer Pathog Ther
January 2025
Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy, Chinese Medical Association Publishing House, Beijing 100052, China.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health concern and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, challenges remain in deploying effective screening strategies for early-stage CRC. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a fecal-based syndecan-2 () methylation test for the detection of colorectal lesions and CRC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVexatious and euphemistic affairs in retractions of scientific publications: A pilot study.
Med J Armed Forces India
August 2023
Lecturer in Statistics & Demography (Community Medicine), Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.
Background: An increasing number of retractions have been published in the recent past which may be conforming to the large number publications being added on a daily basis. Concerns have been flagged time and again regarding comprehensiveness and utility of retraction notices.
Methods: Retraction notices published in PubMed in Jan 23 were analyzed for journal, publisher, article, country affiliation of authors, month of publication, who raised concern, main and additional reason for retraction, completeness of retraction notice, editors/authors requesting for retraction, agreement between authors and editors, and the number of citations received.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!