A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of the implant diameter and bone quality on the primary stability of porous tantalum trabecular metal dental implants: an in vitro biomechanical study. | LitMetric

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the primary, initial stability of Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metal implants (TM) compared with Tapered Screw Vent implants (TSV) with different diameters, inserted in two bone densities.

Methods: A total of 160 implants (80 TM and 80 TSV) with narrow (3.7 mm) and conventional (4.1 mm) diameters and the same length (10 mm) were placed in artificial bone blocks representing bone qualities II and IV. The implant stability was evaluated by insertion torque (IT) and Resonance Frequency Analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post-test for the differences between groups.

Results: The results showed higher ISQ values in dense bone compared with soft bone for all the groups (P < 0.05). Conventional-diameter implants (TSV and TM) showed higher ISQ and IT values compared with narrow implants (TSV and TM) in dense and soft bone (P < 0.05). Tapered TSV implants showed higher stability in soft bone compared with TM implants (P < 0.05). In dense bone, differences were not observed between narrow TSV 3.7 mm and TM 3.7 mm implants (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded: In dense bone blocks, the wider diameter implants are more stable than narrow implants. In soft bone blocks, the tapered TSV implants are more stable than TM implants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12792DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stability porous
8
porous tantalum
8
tantalum trabecular
8
implants tsv
8
bone
6
influence implant
4
implant diameter
4
diameter bone
4
bone quality
4
quality primary
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!