Rationale And Objectives: Although a checklist has been recommended for preventing satisfaction of search (SOS) errors, a previous research study did not demonstrate that benefit. However, observers in that study had to turn away from the image display to use the checklist. The current study tested a vocalized checklist to avoid this constraint.

Materials And Methods: A total of 64 chest computed radiographs, half containing various "test" abnormalities, were read twice by 20 radiologists, once with and once without the addition of a simulated pulmonary nodule. Readers used a vocalized checklist-directing search. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) detection accuracy and decision thresholds were analyzed to study the effects of adding the nodule on detecting the test abnormalities.

Results: Adding nodules induced a substantial reluctance to report the other abnormalities (P < 0.001), as had been the case in the most recent study of the SOS effect in radiography.

Conclusions: The vocalized checklist did not reduce nor eliminate the SOS effect on readiness to report further abnormalities. Although useful for organizing search and reporting, particularly among students, a vocalized checklist does not prevent SOS effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.12.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vocalized checklist
8
influence vocalized
4
checklist
4
checklist detection
4
detection multiple
4
multiple abnormalities
4
abnormalities chest
4
chest radiography
4
radiography rationale
4
rationale objectives
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!