Experience has been theorized to shape how we process faces. Frequent face types are better discriminated and processed using expert-level holistic strategies while less frequent types are less well discriminated and processed using less mature featural strategies. Although experience is probably influencing the development of face processing, it is unclear what aspects of experience are most influential. The current study utilized infant-perspective head-mounted cameras to capture infants' daily lives at 1 and 3 months of age to measure the perceptual qualities of frequent and infrequent face types. We examined experience with upright (i.e., frequently experienced) and inverted (i.e., infrequently experienced) faces. A large majority (88%) of all face exposure was to upright faces. Most faces, regardless of orientation, were viewed near to the infant, alone in the field of view, and in a frontal viewpoint (i.e., an "ideal view"). Although they were less frequent than upright faces, proportionally more non-upright faces were viewed in an "ideal view". At this young age, nearly all faces, even non-upright faces, are seen in ways that facilitate processing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1154581 | DOI Listing |
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
May 2017
a Department of Psychology , Ryerson University, Toronto , ON , Canada.
Exp Brain Res
September 2006
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TN, UK.
The anti-saccade task is an important tool for investigating both the generation of voluntary saccades and the suppression of involuntary, stimulus driven, saccades. In the anti-saccade task participants have to suppress an involuntary saccade to the stimulus in order to generate a voluntary saccade away from the stimulus. The extent to which errors occur in this task indicates the ability of the stimulus to trigger an orienting response that is beyond the control of the participant.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuropsychologia
September 2000
Department of Cognitive Neurology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
The dissociation between object identity and object orientation observed in six patients with brain damage, has been taken as evidence for a view-invariant model of object recognition. However, there was also some indication that these patients were not generally agnosic for object orientation but were able to gain access to at least some information about objects' canonical upright. We studied a new case (KB) with spared knowledge of object identity and impaired perception of object orientation using a forced choice paradigm to contrast directly the patient's ability to perceive objects' canonical upright vs non-upright orientations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!