Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled pain management following orthopedic surgery using either fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) or morphine intravenous (i.v.) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

Setting: Acute Care Hospital.

Patients: Three-open-label, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group phase 3B studies (N = 2095) were conducted that compared fentanyl ITS with morphine i.v. PCA for postoperative pain in hospitalized postoperative patients. A subgroup of orthopedic surgery patients (N = 1,216) was pooled for this analysis; of which 819 completed treatment.

Interventions: A total of 590 patients received fentanyl ITS (40 µg/dose) and 626 patients received morphine i.v. PCA (1 mg/dose) for up to 72 hours.

Main Outcome Measures: Efficacy measures included the patient global assessment (PGA) and the investigator global assessment (IGA) of the method of pain control.

Results: Patients had a mean age of about 60 years, were predominantly Caucasian (90.5 percent), and the majority underwent hip replacement (80.3 percent). There were more patients treated with fentanyl ITS who rated their pain control method as "excellent" compared to morphine i.v. PCA at 24 hours postsurgery (44.8 percent vs 33.0 percent, respectively; p < 0.001), 48 hours (37.5 percent vs 25.3 percent, respectively; p < 0.001), and at the last assessment (54.3 percent vs 39.6 percent, respectively; p < 0.001). There were more investigators who rated treatment with fentanyl ITS as "excellent" compared to morphine i.v. PCA at the last assessment (57.4 percent vs 36.9 percent, respectively; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Following orthopedic surgery, patients and investigators more frequently reported global assessment of pain control as "excellent" on the PGA and IGA assessments with fentanyl ITS than with morphine i.v. PCA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5055/jom.2016.0310DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

morphine pca
20
orthopedic surgery
16
global assessment
12
percent 0001
12
percent
10
fentanyl iontophoretic
8
iontophoretic transdermal
8
transdermal system
8
morphine intravenous
8
intravenous patient-controlled
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of two regional anesthesia methods, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block, for intraoperative and postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Methods: Fifty patients aged 18-80 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II scheduled for elective laparoscopic nephrectomy were included after ethical approval and informed consent. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group TAP (receiving TAP block) or Group ESP (receiving ESP block).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To examine the ramifications of both the modified and traditional subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block (SQLB) on postoperative analgesia in individuals undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Methods: Forty-six individuals slated for elective laparoscopic nephrectomy under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to acquire either traditional or modified SQLB using 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Appendicectomy is a common procedure in children. Regional anaesthesia helps reduce requirements for opioids and hospital stay and enhances recovery. Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane block (L-TAP) was shown to be efficient and potentially superior to port site infiltration (PSI); however, this was not previously studied in paediatric appendicitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Pruritus is a distressing symptom of systemic opioid analgesia that responds poorly to conventional antipruritus treatments. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for postoperative pruritus using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA).

Methods: Opioid-naïve patients who underwent morphine-based IV-PCA for postoperative pain at a tertiary center between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2023, were included retrospectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been considered for managing cancer pain; however, limited research has been conducted on optimizing continuous infusion rates with PCA. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a method that optimizes background infusion (BI) alongside PCA for titrating intravenous (IV) morphine in managing cancer-related pain.

Methods: Forty-four patients with solid tumors who could not manage pain with oral or transdermal opioid analgesics were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive IV morphine through PCA or the conventional method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!