The aim of the study was to examine the correlation between muscle morphology and jumping, sprinting, and throwing performance in participants with different power training duration experience. Thirty-six power-trained young men were assigned to 3 groups according to the length of their power training: less experienced (<1 year), moderately experienced (1-3 years), and experienced (4-7 years). All participants performed countermovement and squat jumps, 60-m sprint, and shot throws twice. Lean body mass (LBM) was evaluated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) with anthropometry. The vastus lateralis architecture and fiber type composition were evaluated with ultrasonography and muscle biopsies, respectively. When all subjects were considered as 1 group (n = 36), jumping performance was correlated with LBM, fascicle length, and type II fiber CSA; sprinting performance was correlated with estimated thigh muscle CSA alone; and shot throwing was correlated with LBM and type I, IIA fiber CSA. In the least experienced group, the LBM of the lower extremities was the most significant contributor for power performance, whereas in the moderately experienced group, the LBM, architectural properties, and type II fiber percentage CSA were the most significant contributors. For the experienced group, fascicle length and type II fiber percentage CSA were the most significant factors for power performance. These data suggest that jumping performance is linked with muscle morphology, regardless of strength or power training. The vastus lateralis muscle morphology could only partially explain throwing performance, whereas it cannot predict sprinting performance. Power performance in experienced participants rely more on the quality of the muscle tissue rather than the quantity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001147DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

power training
12
muscle morphology
8
morphology jumping
8
jumping sprinting
8
sprinting throwing
8
throwing performance
8
performance participants
8
participants power
8
training duration
8
duration experience
8

Similar Publications

The imperative development of point-of-care diagnosis for accurate and rapid medical image segmentation, has become increasingly urgent in recent years. Although some pioneering work has applied complex modules to improve segmentation performance, resulting models are often heavy, which is not practical for the modern clinical setting of point-of-care diagnosis. To address these challenges, we propose UltraNet, a state-of-the-art lightweight model that achieves competitive performance in segmenting multiple parts of medical images with the lowest parameters and computational complexity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: This study examines how power training affects estimated bone strength, revealing that females benefit more than males, especially in the upper limbs (radius). These findings highlight the importance of designing sex-specific exercise programs to enhance bone health. Further research is needed to optimize training duration and address site-specific differences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate the influence of upper body (UB) strength qualities and UB strength training on the performance of high-intensity running and jumping actions and to identify gaps and recommendations for future research.

Methods: A systematic search using the PRISMA Scoping Review protocol was conducted in February 2024 using PubMed, Scopus, and ICTRP. Studies eligible for inclusion were those that reported associations between UB or trunk maximal strength qualities (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of resistance training on stable versus unstable surfaces on strength performance in young judokas. : The study included 18 young judokas (age: 13.2 ± 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: One repetition maximum (1RM) is a vital metric for exercise professionals, but various testing protocols exist, and their impacts on the resulting 1RM, barbell kinetics, and subsequent muscular performance testing are not well understood. This study aimed to compare two previously established protocols and a novel self-led method for determining bench press 1RM, 1RM barbell kinetics, and subsequent muscular performance measures.

Methods: Twenty-four resistance-trained males (n = 12, 24 ± 6.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!