Effect of Different Interset Rest Intervals on Performance of Single and Multijoint Exercises With Near-Maximal Loads.

J Strength Cond Res

1Nursing and Biosciences Post-Graduation Program (PPgEnfBio), Doctorate of Federal University of State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;2Biosciences Laboratory of Human Movement (LABIMH), Tiradentes University (UNIT), Aracajú, Brazil;3Kinesiology and Sports Studies Department, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois;4School of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (EEFD/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and5Health Science Center, Catholic University of Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Published: March 2016

The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of different interset rest intervals on performance of single- and multijoint exercises with near-maximal loads. Fifteen trained men (26.40 ± 4.94 years, 79.00 ± 7.10 kg, 176.6 ± 6.06 cm, 11.80 ± 2.47% body fat, and bench press relative strength: 1.26 ± 0.19 kg·kg of body mass) performed eight sessions (2 exercises × 4 interset rest intervals); each consisting of 5 sets with a 3RM load. The exercises tested were the machine chest fly (MCF) for the single-joint exercise and the barbell bench press (BP) for the multi-joint exercise with 1, 2, 3, and 5 minutes of rest between sets. The results indicated that for the MCF, significantly higher total number of repetitions were completed for the 2- (12.60 ± 2.35 reps; p = 0.027), 3- (13.66 ± 1.84 reps; p = 0.001), and 5-minute (12.93 ± 2.25 reps; p = 0.001) vs. the 1-minute (10.33 ± 2.60 reps) protocol. For the BP, a significantly higher total number of repetitions were completed for 3- (11.66 ± 2.79 reps; p = 0.002) and 5-minute (12.93 ± 2.25 reps; p = 0.001) vs. the 1-minute protocol (7.60 ± 3.52 reps). In addition, subjects completed significantly higher total number of repetitions for the 5-minute (12.93 ± 2.25 reps; p = 0.016) vs. 2-minute (9.53 ± 3.11 reps) protocol. Both exercises presented similar and progressive reductions in repetition performance for all rest protocols along the 5 sets, starting as soon as the second set for the shorter 1-minute rest protocol. In conclusion, to maintain the best consistency in repetition performance, rest intervals of 2 minutes between sets are sufficient for the MCF and 3-5 minutes for the BP. Thus, it appears that longer acute recovery time is needed for a multijoint (core) exercise such as the BP vs. a single-joint (assistance) exercise such as the MCF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001142DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rest intervals
16
interset rest
12
higher total
12
total number
12
number repetitions
12
reps 0001
12
5-minute 1293
12
1293 225
12
225 reps
12
reps
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!