SIRFLOX: Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing First-Line mFOLFOX6 (Plus or Minus Bevacizumab) Versus mFOLFOX6 (Plus or Minus Bevacizumab) Plus Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

J Clin Oncol

Guy A. van Hazel, University of Western Australia; Tom Ferguson, Royal Perth Hospital; David Price and Geoff Bower, Mount Medical Center, Perth; Alex Powell, Hollywood Private Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia; Andrew H. Strickland, Monash Medical Centre, Bentleigh, East Victoria; Vinod Ganju, Frankston Private Hospital Peninsula Oncology Centre, Frankston; Peter Gibbs, Western Hospital, Footscray, Victoria; Euan Walpole, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba; Paul Eliadis, Wesley Medical Centre, Milton, Queensland; Val Gebski, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown; David N. Cade and Kenneth Thurston, Sirtex Medical Limited, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Volker Heinemann, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Munich; Jens Ricke, University Clinic Magdeburg; Hendrik Kroening, Schwerpunktpraxis of Haematology and Oncology, Magdeburg, Germany; Navesh K. Sharma, University of Maryland Medical Center; Fred Moeslein, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Mark Van Buskirk, Data Reduction LLC, Chester, NJ; Michael P.N. Findlay, Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland; David Perez, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin; Bridget A. Robinson, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch; Richard Isaacs, Palmerston North Hospital, Palmerston, New Zealand; Marc Peeters, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Javier Rodríguez, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Ido Wolf and Einat Shacham-Shmueli, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer; Thomas Tichler, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Eveline Boucher, Hopital de Jour, Rennes; and Julien Taieb, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.

Published: May 2016

Purpose: SIRFLOX was a randomized, multicenter trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres to standard fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Patients And Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with liver metastases plus or minus limited extrahepatic metastases were randomly assigned to receive either modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX6; control) or mFOLFOX6 plus SIRT (SIRT) plus or minus bevacizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at any site as assessed by independent centralized radiology review blinded to study arm.

Results: Between October 2006 and April 2013, 530 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (control, 263; SIRT, 267). Median PFS at any site was 10.2 v 10.7 months in control versus SIRT (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.12; P = .43). Median PFS in the liver by competing risk analysis was 12.6 v 20.5 months in control versus SIRT (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P = .002). Objective response rates (ORRs) at any site were similar (68.1% v 76.4% in control v SIRT; P = .113). ORR in the liver was improved with the addition of SIRT (68.8% v 78.7% in control v SIRT; P = .042). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events, including recognized SIRT-related effects, were reported in 73.4% and 85.4% of patients in control versus SIRT.

Conclusion: The addition of SIRT to FOLFOX-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with liver-dominant or liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer did not improve PFS at any site but significantly delayed disease progression in the liver. The safety profile was as expected and was consistent with previous studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.66.1181DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

minus bevacizumab
12
metastatic colorectal
12
pfs site
12
control versus
12
sirt
10
sirflox randomized
8
mfolfox6 minus
8
selective internal
8
internal radiation
8
radiation therapy
8

Similar Publications

Background: Although two recent phase III randomized controlled trials showed survival benefits of undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery for an initial relapse of ovarian cancer, patients who received a poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) as the first-line maintenance treatment, which is currently the standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, were not included in those trials. Therefore, determining an optimal treatment strategy, including secondary cytoreductive surgery, in patients whose cancer progresses even with PARPi treatment, is needed.

Primary Objective: To determine whether secondary cytoreductive surgery is beneficial in patients who have progressed on PARPi maintenance treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Primary clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina represents a rare form of cancer historically correlated with in-utero diethylstibestrol (DES) exposure. Mainstay treatment modalities include surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. There has been a growing interest in immunotherapy in the field of oncology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with a folate remains an essential treatment component for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Leucovorin is the folate most often used, but requires intracellular conversion to a reduced folate, and has high pharmacokinetic variability and limited bioavailability in patients with low folate pathway gene expression. Arfolitixorin is an immediately active form of folate, [6R]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate ([6R]-MTHF), and may improve outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: GSK3β serine/threonine kinase regulates metabolism and glycogen biosynthesis. GSK3β overexpression promotes progression and resistance through NF-κB and p53 apoptotic pathways. GSK3β inhibits immunomodulation by downregulating PD-L1 and LAG-3 checkpoints and increasing NK and T-cell tumor killing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Doublet or triplet chemotherapy plus or minus targeted drugs can achieve a high objective response rate (ORR) and are currently considered to be the backbone of conventional therapy for liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, current biomarkers (such as UGT1A1 and DPYD) are limited to the prediction of toxicity and there are no effective biomarkers to predict chemotherapy response. Therefore, personalized cancer chemotherapy underpinned by genomic alterations in mCRC has received increasing attention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!