VALIDATION OF TWO CLINICAL MEASURES OF CORE STABILITY.

Int J Sports Phys Ther

Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences Department, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Published: February 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • Emerging evidence indicates that poor core stability can lead to injuries in athletes, prompting the development of the Trunk Stability Test (TST) and Unilateral Hip Bridge Endurance Test (UHBE) to assess core stability.
  • The study aimed to evaluate the validity of TST and UHBE against biomechanical measures and other stability tests, hypothesizing that UHBE would show a stronger correlation compared to TST.
  • Results showed that UHBE had a significant relationship with biomechanical measures, while TST had a weak association with both biomechanical measures and other tests, highlighting the potential effectiveness of UHBE as a clinical assessment tool for core stability.

Article Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests poor core stability is a risk factor for low back and lower extremity injuries in athletes. Recently the trunk stability test (TST) and unilateral hip bridge endurance test (UHBE) were developed to clinically assess core stability. Although these and other clinical tests of core stability exist, how well they assess core stability when compared to biomechanical measures of isolated core stability has not been thoroughly evaluated.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purposes of this study were to 1) determine concurrent validity of two novel clinical core stability assessments (TST and UHBE), and 2) assess relationships between these assessments and the trunk endurance and Y-Balance tests. The authors' hypothesized that the TST and UHBE would be highly correlated to the lab-based biomechanical measure of isolated core stability. Also, the TST and UHBE would be moderately correlated with each other, but not with the trunk extensor endurance and Y-Balance.

Study Design: Cross-Sectional design.

Methods: Twenty healthy active individuals completed the TST (recorded number of errors), UHBE (s), trunk extensor endurance (s), Y-Balance (% leg length) test (YBT), and biomechanical test of core stability.

Results: Correlational analyses revealed a small, non-significant association between TST and biomechanical measures (rs = 0.2 - 0.22), while a moderate, significant relationship existed between UHBE and biomechanical measures (rs = -0.49 to -0.56, p < 0.05). There was little to no relationship between TST and UHBE (r = -0.07 to - 0.21), or TST and extensor endurance (r = -0.18 to -0.24). A moderate, significant association existed between TST and two reach directions of the YBT (r = -0.41 to -0.43, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Study data support the utility of UHBE as a clinical measure of core stability. The poor relationship between the TST and biomechanical measures, combined with observation of most control faults occurring in the lower extremity (LE) suggest the TST may not be an appropriate clinical test of core stability.

Levels Of Evidence: Level 3.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739044PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

core stability
32
biomechanical measures
12
tst uhbe
12
core
9
stability
9
assess core
8
isolated core
8
endurance y-balance
8
trunk extensor
8
extensor endurance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!