A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of recovery parameters for xenon versus other inhalation anesthetics: systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Comparison of recovery parameters for xenon versus other inhalation anesthetics: systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Clin Anesth

Department of Anaesthesiology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 52 East Meihua Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, China. Electronic address:

Published: March 2016

Study Objective: To summarize and evaluate the available data describing the recovery parameters of xenon anesthesia.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: Anesthesia for elective surgeries.

Patients: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases including Medline (1964-2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 1990-2012), and Google Scholar (1966-2013).

Interventions: Inhalation of xenon or other anesthetics was administered in elective surgery.

Measurements: Recovery parameters (time to recovery, alertness/sedation scale scores at "eye opening," bispectral index at "reaction on demand," time to extubation, and time to orientation).

Main Results: Eleven RCTs (N = 661 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Recovery from xenon anesthesia was significantly faster in terms of the time to eye opening (mean difference [MD], -4.18 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.03 to -3.32 minutes; P < .00001), the time to reaction on demand (MD, -5.35 minutes; 95% CI, -6.59 to -4.11 minutes; P < .00001), the time to extubation (MD, -4.49 minutes; 95% CI, -5.40 to -3.58 minutes; P < .00001), and the time to orientation (MD, -4.99 minutes; 95% CI, -6.45 to -3.52 minutes; P < .00001).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis confirmed that recovery from xenon anesthesia is faster than other inhalation anesthesia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.10.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

minutes 95%
16
recovery parameters
12
systematic review
12
minutes 00001
12
00001 time
12
parameters xenon
8
controlled trials
8
time extubation
8
recovery xenon
8
xenon anesthesia
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!