Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: Cervical length assessment is important for predicting preterm birth. Cervical length measurement using transabdominal sonography is more comfortable for the patient but has more limitations than transvaginal sonography. Our aim was to determine whether transabdominal sonography could identify those women who should undergo transvaginal sonography for prediction of preterm birth.
Methods: In this prospective study, women underwent cervical length measurements by transabdominal and transvaginal sonography between 20 and 29 gestational weeks and were followed until delivery. We assessed whether short cervical lengths on transabdominal sonography could predict short cervical lengths on transvaginal sonography and whether these measurements could predict preterm births (<34 gestational weeks).
Results: The mean cervical lengths were not significantly different between the techniques (mean ± SD, 3.78 ± 0.82 and 3.82 ± 0.77 cm on transabdominal and transvaginal sonography, respectively; P = .09). The sensitivity of short cervical lengths (<2 cm) on transabdominal sonography for prediction of short cervical lengths on transvaginal sonography was 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and relative risk of short cervical lengths (<2 cm) for predicting preterm birth were 21.4%, 98.68%, 50.00%, 95.32%, and 13.22 when using transabdominal sonography and 28.57%, 94.94%, 66.6%, 95.74%, and 17.78 when using transvaginal sonography, respectively. In an analysis that included cases with transabdominal sonography, the sensitivity of short cervical lengths for predicting preterm birth was increased.
Conclusions: Women whose cervical lengths are measurable and long on transabdominal sonography may not need transvaginal sonography. Women whose cervical lengths are unmeasurable or short (<2 or <2.5 cm) on transabdominal sonography should undergo transvaginal sonography to measure cervical lengths for prediction of preterm birth.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.03026 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!